Investigation of Muscle Activation During Kinetic Chain Based Exercises in Individuals with and Without Forward Head Posture

Overview

Journal J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties Physiology
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 Jul 5

PMID 38968043

Authors

Gamze Cobanoglu

Nevin A Guzel

Zeynep Berfu Ecemis

M Yusuf Demirkan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Band Pull-Apart (BPA) exercise is used to strengthen the periscapular muscles. It was recently stated that the lower extremity and trunk movements should be included in the shoulder rehabilitation programs to optimize an effective energy transfer throughout the kinetic chain.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of kinetic chain based BPA exercise on the muscle activations of the sternocleidomasteideous (SCM) and the trapezius muscles in individuals with and without forward head posture (FHP).

Methods: Eighteen individuals with FHP and 18 individuals without FHP were included. Photographic measurements were made to identify individuals with FHP. The muscle activations of SCM, Upper Trapezius (UT), Middle Trapezius (MT), and Lower Trapezius (LT) were measured with surface EMG. BPA exercise was performed in the standing, unipedal standing, squat, unipedal squat, and Bulgarian split squat (BSS).

Results: There was no Group × Exercise interaction for the SCM, UT, MT, LT muscle activations, or for the UT/MT and UT/LT ratios (p> 0.05). While there was a difference in the activation of all muscles between individuals with and without FHP (p< 0.05), both ratios were similar (p> 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between exercises for SCM, MT, and LT muscle activations (p< 0.000 for these muscles), UT/MT (p< 0.000) and UT/LT ratios (p= 0.004). SCM muscle activation in squat was lower than activation in standing (Mean Difference (MD) = 2.5% Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC); p= 0.004) and in unipedal standing (MD = 2.1% MVIC; p= 0.002). MT muscle activation in squat was higher than activation in standing (MD = 9.7% MVIC), unipedal standing (MD = 7.8% MVIC), unipedal squat (MD = 6.9% MVIC) and BSS (MD = 9.4% MVIC; p< 0.000 for these positions). LT muscle activation in the squat was higher than activation in the standing (MD = 8.5% MVIC) and unipedal squat (MD = 8.1% MVIC; p< 0.004 for these positions). UT/MT ratio in the squat was lower than standing (MD = 0.3), unipedal standing (MD = 0.2) and BSS (MD = 0.3; p< 0.000 for these positions). UT/LT ratio in squat was lower than unipedal squat (MD = 0.5) and BSS (MD = 0.6; p= 0.002; for these positions).

Conclusion: Performing the BPA exercise in the squat position is suggested in cases where lower SCM and UT muscle activation, lower UT/MT, and UT/LT ratios and higher MT and LT muscle activations are needed for individuals with and without FHP.

References

Cools A, Dewitte V, Lanszweert F, Notebaert D, Roets A, Soetens B . Rehabilitation of scapular muscle balance: which exercises to prescribe?. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(10):1744-51. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507303560. View

Borms D, Maenhout A, Berckmans K, Spanhove V, Vanderstukken F, Cools A . Scapulothoracic muscle activity during kinetic chain variations of a prone elevation exercise. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022; 26(3):100420. PMC: 9156994. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100420. View

Fukunaga T, Fedge C, Tyler T, Mullaney M, Schmitt B, Orishimo K . Band Pull-Apart Exercise: Effects of Movement Direction and Hand Position on Shoulder Muscle Activity. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022; 17(3):400-408. PMC: 8975561. DOI: 10.26603/001c.33026. View

Lee M, Lee H, Yong M . Characteristics of cervical position sense in subjects with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014; 26(11):1741-3. PMC: 4242945. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.1741. View

Ruivo R, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita A . Cervical and shoulder postural assessment of adolescents between 15 and 17 years old and association with upper quadrant pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014; 18(4):364-71. PMC: 4183261. DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0027. View

Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, Behtash H, Razmjoo A, Gohari M . Assessment of forward head posture in females: observational and photogrammetry methods. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013; 27(2):131-9. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130426. View

Dehqan B, Delkhoush C, Mirmohammadkhani M, Ehsani F . Does forward head posture change subacromial space in active or passive arm elevation?. J Man Manip Ther. 2020; 29(4):227-234. PMC: 8366652. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1854010. View

Nagai K, Tateuchi H, Takashima S, Miyasaka J, Hasegawa S, Arai R . Effects of trunk rotation on scapular kinematics and muscle activity during humeral elevation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23(3):679-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.01.012. View

Borms D, Maenhout A, Cools A . Incorporation of the Kinetic Chain Into Shoulder-Elevation Exercises: Does It Affect Scapular Muscle Activity?. J Athl Train. 2020; 55(4):343-349. PMC: 7164558. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-136-19. View

10.

Sciascia A, Cromwell R . Kinetic chain rehabilitation: a theoretical framework. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012; 2012:853037. PMC: 3361354. DOI: 10.1155/2012/853037. View

11.

Lee K, Han H, Cheon S, Park S, Yong M . The effect of forward head posture on muscle activity during neck protraction and retraction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(3):977-9. PMC: 4395757. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.977. View

12.

Mylonas K, Tsekoura M, Billis E, Aggelopoulos P, Tsepis E, Fousekis K . Reliability and Validity of Non-radiographic Methods of Forward Head Posture Measurement: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022; 14(8):e27696. PMC: 9354067. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27696. View

13.

Jabbar K, Gandomi F . The comparison of two corrective exercise approaches for hyperkyphosis and forward head posture: A quasi-experimental study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021; 34(4):677-687. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200160. View

14.

Nam S, Son S, Kwon J, Lee N . The Intra- and Inter-rater Reliabilities of the Forward Head Posture Assessment of Normal Healthy Subjects. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013; 25(6):737-9. PMC: 3804999. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.737. View

15.

Khan A, Khan Z, Bhati P, Hussain M . Influence of Forward Head Posture on Cervicocephalic Kinesthesia and Electromyographic Activity of Neck Musculature in Asymptomatic Individuals. J Chiropr Med. 2021; 19(4):230-240. PMC: 7835487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2020.07.002. View

16.

Kara D, Harput G, Duzgun I . Shoulder-Abduction Angle and Trapezius Muscle Activity During Scapular-Retraction Exercise. J Athl Train. 2021; 56(12):1327-1333. PMC: 8675318. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0053.21. View

17.

Cools A, Declercq G, Cambier D, Mahieu N, Witvrouw E . Trapezius activity and intramuscular balance during isokinetic exercise in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006; 17(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00570.x. View

18.

Kara D, Harput G, Duzgun I . Trapezius muscle activation levels and ratios during scapular retraction exercises: A comparative study between patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and healthy controls. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019; 67:119-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.020. View

19.

Burkhart S, Morgan C, Ben Kibler W . The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part III: The SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(6):641-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00389-x. View

20.

Moustafa I, Youssef A, Ahbouch A, Tamim M, Harrison D . Is forward head posture relevant to autonomic nervous system function and cervical sensorimotor control? Cross sectional study. Gait Posture. 2020; 77:29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.004. View