Viscoelastic, Optical, and Surgical Properties of Vitreous Body Replacement Hydrogels After Aging Compared to Porcine Vitreous Bodies And Silicone Oils

Overview

Journal Transl Vis Sci Technol

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Ophthalmology

Date 2024 Jul 5

PMID 38967936

Authors

Maximilian Hammer

Marcel Muuss

Lorenz Herbster

Jonathan Herth

Alexander Scheuerle

Ramin Khoramnia

Grzegorz Labuz

Philipp Uhl

Gerd Uwe Auffarth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: First- (monomers), second- (pre-gelated), and third- (in situ gelating after injection) generation hydrogels were previously introduced to replace the vitreous body after vitrectomy surgery. In this study, we evaluated the surgical, optical, and viscoelastic properties of vitreous body replacement hydrogels before and after an accelerated aging protocol previously applied to intraocular implants.

Methods: Measurements of injection force, removal speed using a clinically established vitrectomy setup, as well as evaluation of forward light scattering and viscoelastic properties before and after an accelerated aging protocol were conducted. Results were compared to porcine and human vitreous bodies, as well as currently clinically applied lighter- and heavier-than-water silicone oils.

Results: Removal speed of all tested hydrogels is substantially lower than the removal speed of porcine vitreous body (0.2 g/min vs. 2.7 g/min for the best performing hydrogel and porcine vitreous body, respectively). Forward light scattering in second-generation vitreous body replacement hydrogels was higher after the aging process than the straylight of the average 70-year-old vitreous body (9.4 vs. 5.5 deg2/sr, respectively). The viscoelastic properties of all hydrogels did not change in a clinically meaningful manner; however, trends toward greater stiffness and greater elasticity after aging were apparent.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates surgical weaknesses of the hydrogels that need to be addressed before clinical use, especially low removal speed. Pre-linked hydrogels (second-generation) showed inferior performance regarding surgical properties compared to in situ gelating hydrogels (third-generation).

Translational Relevance: This study highlights possible pitfalls regarding surgical and optical properties when applying vitreous replacement hydrogels clinically.

Citing Articles

A review of human cornea finite element modeling: geometry modeling, constitutive modeling, and outlooks.

Pang G, Wang C, Wang X, Li X, Meng Q Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1455027.

PMID: 39473927 PMC: 11518721. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1455027.

In Vitro Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Bevacizumab Dissolved in Silicone Oils Compared to Hydrogel-Substitutes and Porcine Vitreous Bodies.

Hammer M, Herth J, Herbster L, Bohmann M, Muuss M, Khoramnia R Gels. 2024; 10(8).

PMID: 39195030 PMC: 11353491. DOI: 10.3390/gels10080501.

References

Tram N, Jiang P, Torres-Flores T, Jacobs K, Chandler H, Swindle-Reilly K . A Hydrogel Vitreous Substitute that Releases Antioxidant. Macromol Biosci. 2019; 20(2):e1900305. DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201900305. View

Williams R, Day M, Garvey M, English R, Wong D . Increasing the extensional viscosity of silicone oil reduces the tendency for emulsification. Retina. 2009; 30(2):300-4. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181babe0c. View

Calciu-Rusu D, Rothfuss E, Eckelt J, Haase T, Dick H, Wolf B . Rheology of sodium hyaluronate saline solutions for ophthalmic use. Biomacromolecules. 2007; 8(4):1287-92. DOI: 10.1021/bm061039k. View

Rainer G, Menapace R, Schmid K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Heinze G . Natural course of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with sodium chondroitin sulfate 4%-sodium hyaluronate 3% (Viscoat). Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(10):1714-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.011. View

Thomes B, Callaghan T . Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1529-34. PMC: 3732199. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S44208. View

Cabeza-Gil I, Rios-Ruiz I, Calvo B . Experimental evaluation of the injection force exerted in intraocular lens delivery with syringe-type injectors. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021; 124:104793. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104793. View

Arshinoff S . Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25(2):167-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80121-7. View

Hammer M, Muuss M, Schickhardt S, Scheuerle A, Khoramnia R, Labuz G . Forward Light Scattering of the Vitreous Gel After Enzymatic Aging: An In Vitro Model to Study Vitreous Opacification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(3):36. PMC: 10981431. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.3.36. View

Soman N, Banerjee R . Artificial vitreous replacements. Biomed Mater Eng. 2003; 13(1):59-74. View

10.

Hurst J, Rickmann A, Heider N, Hohenadl C, Reither C, Schatz A . Long-Term Biocompatibility of a Highly Viscously Thiol-Modified Cross-Linked Hyaluronate as a Novel Vitreous Body Substitute. Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:817353. PMC: 8924550. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.817353. View

11.

Poyer J, Chan K, Arshinoff S . Quantitative method to determine the cohesion of viscoelastic agents by dynamic aspiration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24(8):1130-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80109-0. View

12.

Labuz G, Vargas-Martin F, van den Berg T, Lopez-Gil N . Method for in vitro assessment of straylight from intraocular lenses. Biomed Opt Express. 2015; 6(11):4457-64. PMC: 4646552. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.6.004457. View

13.

Hammer M, Schickhardt S, Munro D, Scheuerle A, Mayer C, Auffarth G . Physicochemical Properties of Explanted Silicone Oil After Use as an Intraocular Tamponade. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(2):3. PMC: 8819347. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.3. View

14.

CIBIS P, Becker B, Okun E, Canaan S . The use of liquid silicone in retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962; 68:590-9. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1962.00960030594005. View

15.

Lu Y, Chan Y, Lau L, Chao Y, Shih K, Lai S . Adhesion of silicone oil and emulsification: an in vitro assessment using a microfluidic device and 'Eye-on-a-Chip'. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 97(3):313-318. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13982. View

16.

Sebag J . Vitreous and Vision Degrading Myodesopsia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020; 79:100847. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100847. View

17.

Lu Y, Chan Y, Lau L, Wong D, Wong J, Shih K . Amphiphilic additives in silicone oil tamponade and emulsification: an eye-on-a-chip study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 98(2):e232-e237. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14212. View

18.

Schulz A, Rickmann A, Wahl S, Germann A, Viktor Stanzel B, Januschowski K . Alginate- and Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels as Vitreous Substitutes: An In Vitro Evaluation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021; 9(13):34. PMC: 7757634. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.34. View

19.

Su W, Chen K, Chen Y, Lee Y, Tseng C, Lin F . An injectable oxidated hyaluronic acid/adipic acid dihydrazide hydrogel as a vitreous substitute. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010; 22(13):1777-97. DOI: 10.1163/092050610X522729. View

20.

Chan Y, Ng C, Knox P, Garvey M, Williams R, Wong D . Emulsification of silicone oil and eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(13):9721-7. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8586. View