Morphometric Analysis of Placenta and Fetal Doppler Indices in Normal and High-Risk Pregnancies

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Jul 5

PMID 38966466

Authors

G Mahalinga

K V Rajasekhar

M Venkateshwar Reddy

S Saravana Kumar

Syed Khaja Waheeduddin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background High-risk pregnancies, encompassing pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia toxemia (PET), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), represent intricate medical challenges with potential repercussions for maternal and fetal health. This research undertakes a comprehensive comparative investigation into the variations of Doppler indices and placental parameters within the context of these high-risk conditions when juxtaposed against pregnancies characterized as normal. Methodology Employing a rigorous cross-sectional study design, a diverse cohort of pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes, IUGR, PIH, and preeclampsia was meticulously assembled. Additionally, a group of normal pregnant women served as the comparative reference. Doppler ultrasound assessments, viz, pulsatility index (PI), were carefully performed to estimate blood flow velocities within critical maternal and fetal vessels, while placental parameters were meticulously quantified, encompassing dimensions, vascular architecture, and morphological features. Results Except in the GDM group, all high-risk groups had reduced estimated placental weight and actual birth weight than normal pregnant women. All high-risk groups showed a highly significant elevation of the PI of the umbilical artery and PI of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) than normal but the PI of MCA was significantly reduced in the PET group than in normal individuals. The cerebro-placental ratio in the GDM and IUGR groups revealed markedly greater values, whereas PET showed lower values. IUGR and PIH groups showed a substantial reduction in the fetal birth weight. All high-risk groups (GDM, IUGR, PIH, and PET) showed a highly significant reduction in luminal area umbilical artery 1 than the normal pregnant women. In IUGR, marginal placental insertion was very high, followed by GDM and PET groups. Conclusions This study reveals that Doppler indices, placental parameters, newborn weight, and their related ratios may be utilized to anticipate gestation difficulties and gain insight into the pathophysiology of problematic conceptions.

References

Thame M, Osmond C, Bennett F, Wilks R, Forrester T . Fetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58(6):894-900. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601909. View

Konwar R, Basumatari B, Dutta M, Mahanta Sr P, Saikia A, Uk R . Role of Doppler Waveforms in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension and Its Correlation With Perinatal Outcome. Cureus. 2021; 13(10):e18888. PMC: 8601394. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18888. View

Shabani Zanjani M, Nasirzadeh R, Fereshtehnejad S, Yoonesi Asl L, Alemzadeh S, Askari S . Fetal cerebral hemodynamic in gestational diabetic versus normal pregnancies: a Doppler velocimetry of middle cerebral and umbilical arteries. Acta Neurol Belg. 2013; 114(1):15-23. DOI: 10.1007/s13760-013-0221-7. View

McNamara H, Hutcheon J, Platt R, Benjamin A, Kramer M . Risk factors for high and low placental weight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013; 28(2):97-105. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12104. View

Babah O, Oluwole A, Akinajo O, Owie E, Ohazurike E . Foeto-placental parameters in normal pregnancy and factors affecting them. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018; 25(4):234-238. DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_97_18. View

Slawek-Szmyt S, Kawka-Paciorkowska K, Cieplucha A, Lesiak M, Ropacka-Lesiak M . Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction as Risk Factors of Future Maternal Cardiovascular Disease-A Review. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20). PMC: 9605579. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206048. View

Simanaviciute D, Gudmundsson S . Fetal middle cerebral to uterine artery pulsatility index ratios in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28(6):794-801. DOI: 10.1002/uog.3805. View

Sankar K, Bhanu P, Ramalingam K, Kiran S, Ramakrishna B . Histomorphological and morphometrical changes of placental terminal villi of normotensive and preeclamptic mothers. Anat Cell Biol. 2014; 46(4):285-90. PMC: 3875846. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2013.46.4.285. View

Kadivar M, Khamseh M, Malek M, Khajavi A, Noohi A, Najafi L . Histomorphological changes of the placenta and umbilical cord in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2020; 97:71-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.06.018. View

10.

Roberts J, Lain K . Recent Insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2002; 23(5):359-72. DOI: 10.1053/plac.2002.0819. View

11.

Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T . Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30(3):287-96. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4088. View

12.

Thame M, Osmond C, Wilks R, Bennett F, Forrester T . Second-trimester placental volume and infant size at birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98(2):279-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01414-4. View

13.

Scott K, Usher R . Fetal malnutrition: its incidence, causes, and effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966; 94(7):951-63. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90033-0. View

14.

Olaya-C M, Garrido M, Hernandez-Losa J, Sese M, Ayala-Ramirez P, Somoza R . The umbilical cord, preeclampsia and the VEGF family. Int J Womens Health. 2018; 10:783-795. PMC: 6276640. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S174734. View

15.

Kim H, Cho S, Kwon H, Sohn I, Hwang H . The significance of placental ratios in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014; 57(5):358-66. PMC: 4175595. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.358. View

16.

Pallotto E, Kilbride H . Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49(2):257-69. DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008. View

17.

Resnik R . Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99(3):490-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01780-x. View

18.

Peleg D, Kennedy C, Hunter S . Intrauterine growth restriction: identification and management. Am Fam Physician. 1998; 58(2):453-60, 466-7. View

19.

Khanduri S, Chhabra S, Yadav S, Sabharwal T, Chaudhary M, Usmani T . Role of Color Doppler Flowmetry in Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Retardation in High-Risk Pregnancy. Cureus. 2018; 9(11):e1827. PMC: 5757851. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1827. View

20.

Lodge J, Flatley C, Kumar S . The fetal cerebroplacental ratio in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 61(6):898-904. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13400. View