» Articles » PMID: 38966278

Alliance for Scientific Autism Intervention: System Components and Outcome Data from High-Quality Service Delivery Organizations

Abstract

Promoting excellence in autism intervention is arguably more urgent than ever for the field of applied behavior analysis. To fulfill this objective, autism agencies must operate from validated program systems and do so with fidelity. Program components include, but are not limited to, staff training and evaluation of clinical skills, functional personnel roles designed to promote positive outcomes for those served, and professional staff-communication-skill repertoires. Data on client outcomes must be tied to implementation of core program variables; and, contingencies between the data on client outcomes and staff performance must exist. Furthermore, these contingencies must be yoked across members of the organization to ensure a sustainable and effective program model. Finally, data on consumer satisfaction must be collected and used to evaluate program components and agency practices. Members of the Alliance for Scientific Autism Intervention have implemented key program-wide systems based upon the work of McClannahan and Krantz , 589-596 (1993) for decades and across various agency cultures. Data collected by six independent educational agencies on client outcomes, program implementation, and consumer feedback for a 10-year time span demonstrate the sustainability of the model and support the importance of key organizational systems and the relationship between implementation of the model and high-quality outcomes for individuals with autism.

References
1.
Rohrer J, Marshall K, Suzio C, Weiss M . Soft Skills: The Case for Compassionate Approaches or How Behavior Analysis Keeps Finding Its Heart. Behav Anal Pract. 2021; 14(4):1135-1143. PMC: 8586117. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-021-00563-x. View

2.
Odom S, Hall L, Suhrheinrich J . Implementation Science, Behavior Analysis, and Supporting Evidence-based Practices for Individuals with Autism. Eur J Behav Anal. 2020; 21(1):55-73. PMC: 7518547. DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2019.1641952. View

3.
Wolf M . Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978; 11(2):203-14. PMC: 1311293. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203. View

4.
Parsons M, Rollyson J, Reid D . Evidence-based staff training: a guide for practitioners. Behav Anal Pract. 2013; 5(2):2-11. PMC: 3592486. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391819. View

5.
Eldevik S, Eikeseth S, Jahr E, Smith T . Effects of low-intensity behavioral treatment for children with autism and mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006; 36(2):211-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-005-0058-x. View