» Articles » PMID: 38963458

Mechanisms of Microbial Co-aggregation in Mixed Anaerobic Cultures

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Co-aggregation of anaerobic microorganisms into suspended microbial biofilms (aggregates) serves ecological and biotechnological functions. Tightly packed aggregates of metabolically interdependent bacteria and archaea play key roles in cycling of carbon and nitrogen. Additionally, in biotechnological applications, such as wastewater treatment, microbial aggregates provide a complete metabolic network to convert complex organic material. Currently, experimental data explaining the mechanisms behind microbial co-aggregation in anoxic environments is scarce and scattered across the literature. To what extent does this process resemble co-aggregation in aerobic environments? Does the limited availability of terminal electron acceptors drive mutualistic microbial relationships, contrary to the commensal relationships observed in oxygen-rich environments? And do co-aggregating bacteria and archaea, which depend on each other to harvest the bare minimum Gibbs energy from energy-poor substrates, use similar cellular mechanisms as those used by pathogenic bacteria that form biofilms? Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of why and how mixed anaerobic microbial communities co-aggregate and discuss potential future scientific advancements that could improve the study of anaerobic suspended aggregates. KEY POINTS: • Metabolic dependency promotes aggregation of anaerobic bacteria and archaea • Flagella, pili, and adhesins play a role in the formation of anaerobic aggregates • Cyclic di-GMP/AMP signaling may trigger the polysaccharides production in anaerobes.

Citing Articles

Physicochemical profiles of mixed ruminal microbes in response to surface tension and specific surface area.

Liu Y, Liao J, Tang S, Zhou C, Tan Z, Salem A Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11():1514952.

PMID: 39834927 PMC: 11743942. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1514952.

References
1.
Moons P, Michiels C, Aertsen A . Bacterial interactions in biofilms. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009; 35(3):157-68. DOI: 10.1080/10408410902809431. View

2.
Nwoko E, Okeke I . Bacteria autoaggregation: how and why bacteria stick together. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021; 49(3):1147-1157. PMC: 8286834. DOI: 10.1042/BST20200718. View

3.
Pohlschroder M, Esquivel R . Archaeal type IV pili and their involvement in biofilm formation. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:190. PMC: 4371748. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00190. View

4.
Choo S, Mohammed W, Mutha N, Rostami N, Ahmed H, Krasnogor N . Transcriptomic Responses to Coaggregation between Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus oralis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021; 87(22):e0155821. PMC: 8552878. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01558-21. View

5.
Wolfe A, Visick K . Get the message out: cyclic-Di-GMP regulates multiple levels of flagellum-based motility. J Bacteriol. 2007; 190(2):463-75. PMC: 2223684. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01418-07. View