» Articles » PMID: 38962002

Engineering Strategies to Safely Drive CAR T-cells into the Future

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2024 Jul 4
PMID 38962002
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has proven a breakthrough in cancer treatment in the last decade, giving unprecedented results against hematological malignancies. All approved CAR T-cell products, as well as many being assessed in clinical trials, are generated using viral vectors to deploy the exogenous genetic material into T-cells. Viral vectors have a long-standing clinical history in gene delivery, and thus underwent iterations of optimization to improve their efficiency and safety. Nonetheless, their capacity to integrate semi-randomly into the host genome makes them potentially oncogenic via insertional mutagenesis and dysregulation of key cellular genes. Secondary cancers following CAR T-cell administration appear to be a rare adverse event. However several cases documented in the last few years put the spotlight on this issue, which might have been underestimated so far, given the relatively recent deployment of CAR T-cell therapies. Furthermore, the initial successes obtained in hematological malignancies have not yet been replicated in solid tumors. It is now clear that further enhancements are needed to allow CAR T-cells to increase long-term persistence, overcome exhaustion and cope with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To this aim, a variety of genomic engineering strategies are under evaluation, most relying on CRISPR/Cas9 or other gene editing technologies. These approaches are liable to introduce unintended, irreversible genomic alterations in the product cells. In the first part of this review, we will discuss the viral and non-viral approaches used for the generation of CAR T-cells, whereas in the second part we will focus on gene editing and non-gene editing T-cell engineering, with particular regard to advantages, limitations, and safety. Finally, we will critically analyze the different gene deployment and genomic engineering combinations, delineating strategies with a superior safety profile for the production of next-generation CAR T-cell.

Citing Articles

Clinical Proof-of-Concept of a Non-Gene Editing Technology Using miRNA-Based shRNA to Engineer Allogeneic CAR T-Cells.

Lonez C, Bolsee J, Huberty F, Nguyen T, Jacques-Hespel C, Anguille S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004122 PMC: 11855736. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041658.


Autologous Paracrine Prostasin-Matriptase Serine Protease Interaction in Lymphoid Cancer Cells.

Chen L, Chai K Cells. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 39996720 PMC: 11853515. DOI: 10.3390/cells14040247.


Advanced delivery systems for gene editing: A comprehensive review from the GenE-HumDi COST Action Working Group.

Cavazza A, Molina-Estevez F, Plaza Reyes A, Ronco V, Naseem A, Malensek S Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2025; 36(1):102457.

PMID: 39991472 PMC: 11847086. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102457.


The potential of cellular homing behavior in tumor immunotherapy: from basic discoveries to clinical applications of immune, mesenchymal stem, and cancer cell homing.

Li D, Yang Y, Zheng G, Meng L, Shang L, Ren J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1495978.

PMID: 39726590 PMC: 11669694. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1495978.


Egg Cooling After Oviposition Extends the Permissive Period for Microinjection-Mediated Genome Modification in .

Uchino K, Waizumi R, Sumitani M, Sakai H, Yamada N, Kojima K Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684354 PMC: 11641327. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312642.


References
1.
Irving M, Lanitis E, Migliorini D, Ivics Z, Guedan S . Choosing the Right Tool for Genetic Engineering: Clinical Lessons from Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2021; 32(19-20):1044-1058. PMC: 8697565. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2021.173. View

2.
Ruella M, Xu J, Barrett D, Fraietta J, Reich T, Ambrose D . Induction of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by transduction of a single leukemic B cell. Nat Med. 2018; 24(10):1499-1503. PMC: 6511988. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0201-9. View

3.
Boutin J, Rosier J, Cappellen D, Prat F, Toutain J, Pennamen P . CRISPR-Cas9 globin editing can induce megabase-scale copy-neutral losses of heterozygosity in hematopoietic cells. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):4922. PMC: 8363739. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25190-6. View

4.
Maude S, Laetsch T, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H . Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(5):439-448. PMC: 5996391. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866. View

5.
Kushawah G, Hernandez-Huertas L, Abugattas-Nunez Del Prado J, Martinez-Morales J, DeVore M, Hassan H . CRISPR-Cas13d Induces Efficient mRNA Knockdown in Animal Embryos. Dev Cell. 2020; 54(6):805-817.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.013. View