» Articles » PMID: 38958892

Community-Engaged Data Science (CEDS): A Case Study of Working with Communities to Use Data to Inform Change

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jul 3
PMID 38958892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Data-informed decision making is a critical goal for many community-based public health research initiatives. However, community partners often encounter challenges when interacting with data. The Community-Engaged Data Science (CEDS) model offers a goal-oriented, iterative guide for communities to collaborate with research data scientists through data ambassadors. This study presents a case study of CEDS applied to research on the opioid epidemic in 18 counties in Ohio as part of the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Data ambassadors provided a pivotal role in empowering community coalitions to translate data into action using key steps of CEDS which included: data landscapes identifying available data in the community; data action plans from logic models based on community data needs and gaps of data; data collection/sharing agreements; and data systems including portals and dashboards. Throughout the CEDS process, data ambassadors emphasized sustainable data workflows, supporting continued data engagement beyond the HCS. The implementation of CEDS in Ohio underscored the importance of relationship building, timing of implementation, understanding communities' data preferences, and flexibility when working with communities. Researchers should consider implementing CEDS and integrating a data ambassador in community-based research to enhance community data engagement and drive data-informed interventions to improve public health outcomes.

References
1.
Wu E, Villani J, Davis A, Fareed N, Harris D, Huerta T . Community dashboards to support data-informed decision-making in the HEALing communities study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108331. PMC: 7528750. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108331. View

2.
Provost F, Fawcett T . Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making. Big Data. 2016; 1(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1089/big.2013.1508. View

3.
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A . Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19:173-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. View

4.
Knudsen H, Drainoni M, Gilbert L, Huerta T, Oser C, Aldrich A . Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108330. PMC: 7531282. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108330. View

5.
Sprague Martinez L, Rapkin B, Young A, Freisthler B, Glasgow L, Hunt T . Community engagement to implement evidence-based practices in the HEALing communities study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108326. PMC: 7537729. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108326. View