» Articles » PMID: 38956788

Improving the Identification of Bone-specific Physical Activity Using Wrist-worn Accelerometry: A Cross-sectional Study in 11-12-year-old Australian Children

Overview
Journal Eur J Sport Sci
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2024 Jul 3
PMID 38956788
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physical activity (PA) during childhood and adolescence is important for the accrual of maximal peak bone mass. The precise dose that benefits bone remains unclear as methods commonly used to analyze PA data are unsuitable for measuring bone-relevant PA. Using improved accelerometry methods, this study identified the amount and intensity of PA most strongly associated with bone outcomes in 11-12-year-olds. Participants (n = 770; 382 boys) underwent tibial peripheral quantitative computed tomography to assess trabecular and cortical density, endosteal and periosteal circumference and polar stress-strain index. Seven-day wrist-worn raw acceleration data averaged over 1-s epochs was used to estimate time accumulated above incremental PA intensities (50 milli-gravitational unit (mg) increments from 200 to 3000 mg). Associations between time spent above each 50 mg increment and bone outcomes were assessed using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, maturity, socioeconomic position, muscle cross-sectional area and PA below the intensity of interest. There was a gradual increase in mean R change across all bone-related outcomes as the intensity increased in 50 mg increments from >200 to >700 mg. All outcomes became significant at >700 mg (R change = 0.6%-1.3% and p = 0.001-0.02). Any further increases in intensity led to a reduction in mean R change and associations became non-significant for all outcomes >1500 mg. Using more appropriate accelerometry methods (1-s epochs; no a priori application of traditional cut-points) enabled us to identify that ∼10 min/day of PA >700 mg (equivalent to running ∼10 km/h) was positively associated with pQCT-derived measures of bone density, geometry and strength in 11-12-year-olds.

References
1.
Stiles V, Pearce M, Moore I, Langford J, Rowlands A . Wrist-worn Accelerometry for Runners: Objective Quantification of Training Load. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018; 50(11):2277-2284. PMC: 6195805. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001704. View

2.
Fraysse F, Grobler A, Muller J, Wake M, Olds T . Physical activity and sedentary activity: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11-12 years and their parents. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(Suppl 3):136-146. PMC: 6624037. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023194. View

3.
van Hees V, Gorzelniak L, Dean Leon E, Eder M, Pias M, Taherian S . Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61691. PMC: 3634007. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061691. View

4.
Rowlands A, Yates T, Davies M, Khunti K, Edwardson C . Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48(10):1935-41. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000978. View

5.
Moyer-Mileur L, Quick J, Murray M . Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the tibia: pediatric reference values. J Clin Densitom. 2008; 11(2):283-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.11.002. View