» Articles » PMID: 38954306

Cognitive, Metacognitive, Motivational, and Emotional Predictors of the Intensity of Internet Gaming Disorder Among Adolescents

Overview
Journal Psychiatr Q
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Jul 2
PMID 38954306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is multifaceted and can have significant negative consequences. The present study examined the contribution of cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and emotional factors as predictors for IGD severity. In a cross-sectional study, 703 Iranian adolescents (36.8% females, mean age = 16.98 years [SD = 1.23]) completed an online survey. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that the cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and emotional factors predicted 7.8%, 17.4%, 1.4%, and 1.9% of the variance in IGD symptoms, respectively. The findings indicated that the cognitive factors including some maladaptive cognitions, such as cognitive salience, regret, and perfectionism, and metacognitive factors including some maladaptive metacognitions (negative metacognitions regarding the uncontrollability of online gaming and negative metacognitions regarding the dangers of online gaming) were significant predictors of IGD severity, highlighting their importance in understanding and predicting problematic gaming behaviors. Although contributing to the variance in IGD, motivational factors (escape, coping, and skill development) and emotional factors including emotion regulation (especially reappraisal) played relatively smaller roles compared to cognitive and metacognitive factors. Of the examined predictive factors, metacognitions were the most important predictor of IGD severity. Exploratory moderator analyses showed significant interactions between three predictors of IGD (reappraisal, negative metacognitions, and cognitive salience) with loneliness, stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Reappraisal was the most frequent predictor and had a significant interaction with these variables. Other predictors independently impacted IGD irrespective of the level of loneliness, stress, anxiety, or depressive symptoms. Based on these findings, special attention to metacognitive, cognitive, emotional, and motivational factors is suggested in the treatment of IGD.

References
1.
Hawi N, Samaha M, Griffiths M . Internet gaming disorder in Lebanon: Relationships with age, sleep habits, and academic achievement. J Behav Addict. 2018; 7(1):70-78. PMC: 6035028. DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.16. View

2.
Gao Y, Wang J, Dong G . The prevalence and possible risk factors of internet gaming disorder among adolescents and young adults: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Psychiatr Res. 2022; 154:35-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.049. View

3.
Alimoradi Z, Lin C, Brostrom A, Bulow P, Bajalan Z, Griffiths M . Internet addiction and sleep problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019; 47:51-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.004. View

4.
Lin C, Potenza M, Brostrom A, Pakpour A . Internet gaming disorder, psychological distress, and insomnia in adolescent students and their siblings: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Addict Behav Rep. 2021; 13:100332. PMC: 7786042. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100332. View

5.
Wong H, Mo H, Potenza M, Chan M, Lau W, Chui T . Relationships between Severity of Internet Gaming Disorder, Severity of Problematic Social Media Use, Sleep Quality and Psychological Distress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6). PMC: 7143464. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061879. View