» Articles » PMID: 38951620

An Increase of Serum CA-125 to Two Times of Nadir Level Strongly Predicts the Image-identified Relapse of Serous Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jul 1
PMID 38951620
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using 70 U/ml or 35 U/ml as CA125 routine abnormal threshold may result in omissions in the relapse detection of Ovarian cancer (OvCa). This study aimed to clarify the association between a biochemical relapse (only the elevation of CA125) and an image-identified relapse to predict the relapsed lesions better. 162 patients who achieved complete clinical response were enrolled from women diagnosed with stage I-IV serous ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers from January 2013 to June 2019 at our center. The CA125 level of 2 × nadir was defined as the indicator of image-identified relapse (P < 0.001). Compared to CA125 level exceeding 35 U/ml, the 2 × nadir of CA125 improve the sensitivity of image-identified relapse (84.9% vs 67.4%, P < 0.001); the 2 × nadir value can act as an earlier warning relapse signal with a longer median time to image-identified relapse (2.7 vs. 0 months, P < 0.001). Of the relapsed population, there was no difference of CA125 changing trend between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary debulking surgery (PDS) group after initial treatment. Compared with 35 U/ml, CA125 reaching 2 × nadir during the follow-up process might be a more sensitive and early relapse signal in patients with serous OvCa. This criterion may help guide patients to be recommended for imaging examination to detect potential relapse in time.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Magnetic Resonance in the Assessment of Peritoneal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with or Without BRCA Mutation.

Jankowska-Lombarska M, Grabowska-Derlatka L, Kraj L, Derlatka P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39594694 PMC: 11591656. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223738.

References
1.
Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson G, Kitchener H, Lopes T . Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(9990):249-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6. View

2.
Tanner E, Chi D, Eisenhauer E, Diaz-Montes T, Santillan A, Bristow R . Surveillance for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: survival impact or lead-time bias?. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 117(2):336-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.014. View

3.
Riedinger J, Wafflart J, Ricolleau G, Eche N, Larbre H, Basuyau J . CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction chemotherapy are independent predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of a French multicentric study. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17(8):1234-8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl120. View

4.
Vallius T, Hynninen J, Auranen A, Matomaki J, Oksa S, Roering P . Postoperative human epididymis protein 4 predicts primary therapy outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017; 39(2):1010428317691189. DOI: 10.1177/1010428317691189. View

5.
Rustin G, Nelstrop A, Tuxen M, Lambert H . Defining progression of ovarian carcinoma during follow-up according to CA 125: a North Thames Ovary Group Study. Ann Oncol. 1996; 7(4):361-4. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010602. View