6.
Demirci S, van Dijk A, Sanchez Perez G, Aflitos S, de Ridder D, Peters S
. Distribution, position and genomic characteristics of crossovers in tomato recombinant inbred lines derived from an interspecific cross between Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum pimpinellifolium. Plant J. 2016; 89(3):554-564.
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13406.
View
7.
Crow T, Ta J, Nojoomi S, Aguilar-Rangel M, Torres Rodriguez J, Gates D
. Gene regulatory effects of a large chromosomal inversion in highland maize. PLoS Genet. 2020; 16(12):e1009213.
PMC: 7752097.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009213.
View
8.
Ito H, Gaubert H, Bucher E, Mirouze M, Vaillant I, Paszkowski J
. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature. 2011; 472(7341):115-9.
DOI: 10.1038/nature09861.
View
9.
Schwander T, Libbrecht R, Keller L
. Supergenes and complex phenotypes. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(7):R288-94.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.056.
View
10.
Shen C, Wang N, Huang C, Wang M, Zhang X, Lin Z
. Population genomics reveals a fine-scale recombination landscape for genetic improvement of cotton. Plant J. 2019; 99(3):494-505.
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14339.
View
11.
Underwood C, Choi K
. Heterogeneous transposable elements as silencers, enhancers and targets of meiotic recombination. Chromosoma. 2019; 128(3):279-296.
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-019-00718-4.
View
12.
Yang X, Caro M, Hutton S, Scott J, Guo Y, Wang X
. Fine mapping of the tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance gene - on chromosome 11 of tomato. Mol Breed. 2014; 34:749-760.
PMC: 4092234.
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-014-0072-9.
View
13.
Fuentes R, de Ridder D, van Dijk A, Peters S
. Domestication Shapes Recombination Patterns in Tomato. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 39(1).
PMC: 8763028.
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab287.
View
14.
Herget T, Schell J, Schreier P
. Elicitor-specific induction of one member of the chitinase gene family in Arachis hypogaea. Mol Gen Genet. 1990; 224(3):469-76.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00262442.
View
15.
Tieman D, Zhu G, Resende Jr M, Lin T, Nguyen C, Bies D
. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science. 2017; 355(6323):391-394.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aal1556.
View
16.
Ziolkowski P, Underwood C, Lambing C, Martinez-Garcia M, Lawrence E, Ziolkowska L
. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control crossover recombination. Genes Dev. 2017; 31(3):306-317.
PMC: 5358726.
DOI: 10.1101/gad.295501.116.
View
17.
Moyle L
. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution. 2008; 62(12):2995-3013.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00487.x.
View
18.
Sharma N, Sahu P, Prasad A, Muthamilarasan M, Waseem M, Khan Y
. The Sw5a gene confers resistance to ToLCNDV and triggers an HR response after direct AC4 effector recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(33).
PMC: 8379908.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101833118.
View
19.
Wang X, Gao L, Jiao C, Stravoravdis S, Hosmani P, Saha S
. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):5817.
PMC: 7670462.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19682-0.
View
20.
Qiu Z, Li R, Zhang S, Wang K, Xu M, Li J
. Identification of Regulatory DNA Elements Using Genome-wide Mapping of DNase I Hypersensitive Sites during Tomato Fruit Development. Mol Plant. 2016; 9(8):1168-1182.
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.05.013.
View