» Articles » PMID: 38948887

Antibacterial, Antioxidant, Cytotoxicity Activity, and Molecular Modelling of Compounds Isolated from Roots of

Overview
Journal Biochem Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2024 Jul 1
PMID 38948887
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The plant has been utilized in folk medicine. Analyzing phytochemical composition of dichloromethane/methanol (1 : 1) root part of gave oleic acid (), caffeic acid-2-hydroxynonylester (), catechin (), and a pregnane derivative (). NMR spectroscopy was used to characterize compounds , while compound was identified through GC-MS analysis and literature comparison. The cytotoxicity of extracts from roots of was conducted against MCF-7 cell lines (human breast cancer) by MTT assay. According to the cytotoxicity study, -hexane extract exhibited a high level of toxicity with 28.9 ± 5.6% cell viability. Antibacterial activity was tested against , , , and The highest bacterial growth mean inhibition zone was measured for catechin (3) (13.72 ± 0.05 mm)) against at 0.25 mg/mL and acceptable related to standard. Antioxidant activity was studied by the DPPH assay. Based on the data from the antioxidant study, DCM/MeOH extract (70.32%) and catechin () showed good antioxidant activity (65.61%) (IC 0.25 g/mL) relative to that of the positive control (78.21%, IC 0.014 g/mL) at 12.5 g/mL. In each docking pose, catechin () scored higher binding affinity of -7.9, -7.2, and -6.4 kcal/mol towards PqsA, DNA gyraseB, and PK, respectively, compared to amoxicillin (-8.1, -6.1, and -6.4 kcal/mol). All five Lipinski rules were obeyed by compounds , which showed an acceptable drug resemblance. The lipophilicity was computed as less than five (1.47-4.01) indicating a lipophilic property. Catechin () obeys Veber's rule implying its good oral bioavailability. Binding affinity scores of catechin ()-protein interactions are in line with those from tests, indicating its potential antibacterial effect. The obtained cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity results support the utilization of in folk medicine.

References
1.
Zaidan M, Noor Rain A, Badrul A, Adlin A, Norazah A, Zakiah I . In vitro screening of five local medicinal plants for antibacterial activity using disc diffusion method. Trop Biomed. 2006; 22(2):165-70. View

2.
Itharat A, Houghton P, Eno-Amooquaye E, Burke P, Sampson J, Raman A . In vitro cytotoxic activity of Thai medicinal plants used traditionally to treat cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 90(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2003.09.014. View

3.
Girma B, Mulisa E, Tessema S, Amelo W . Ethnomedicine Claim Directed in Prediction of Anticancer Activity. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018; 28(1):83-92. PMC: 5866292. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i1.10. View

4.
Ferreira L, Andricopulo A . ADMET modeling approaches in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2019; 24(5):1157-1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.03.015. View

5.
Mkala E, Mutungi M, Mutinda E, Oulo M, Wanga V, Mwachala G . Understanding the Ethnobotany, Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Distribution of Genus (Aristolochiaceae). Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(3). PMC: 8001087. DOI: 10.3390/plants10030494. View