» Articles » PMID: 38946011

No Evidence of Mid-flexion Instability After Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty As Assessed by Intraoperative Pressure Sensors

Overview
Journal Arthroplasty
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jun 30
PMID 38946011
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Mid-flexion instability has been identified as a cause for dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotic-assisted surgery using the Mako robot only allows for assessment of stability at 10° and 90°. This study aimed to investigate any evidence of mid-flexion instability in Mako-assisted TKA.

Methods: Data from 72 TKA in 59 patients from 2018 to 2022 were collected. All patients underwent an RA (Mako, Stryker, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA), single-radius design, cruciate-retaining TKA. Intraoperatively, medial, and lateral pressures were measured at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion using a pressure sensor (Verasense, OrthoSensor, 59 Inc., Dania Beach, FL, USA). The knee was considered balanced if the difference in pressures between compartments was less than 15 pounds-force (lbf).

Results: There was no significant difference between the pressures measured in the medial compartment at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion (P = 0.696). A statistically significant difference was found between the pressures measured in the lateral compartment at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion, with the 10° value being significantly higher (P < 0.001), but this did not exceed the threshold of 15 lbf. None of the patients had a pressure difference of more than 15 lbf when pressures at 45° were compared to that at 10° and 90°, medially or laterally.

Conclusion: This study showed no evidence of mid-flexion instability in Mako-assisted TKA, using a single radius, cruciate-retaining prosthesis whilst maintaining the joint height.

Level Of Evidence: Level III retrospective cohort study.

References
1.
Wilson C, Theodoulou A, Damarell R, Krishnan J . Knee instability as the primary cause of failure following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): A systematic review on the patient, surgical and implant characteristics of revised TKA patients. Knee. 2017; 24(6):1271-1281. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.08.060. View

2.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859. View

3.
Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger J, Kuster M . The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(3):430-436.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. View

4.
Stoddard J, Deehan D, Bull A, McCaskie A, Amis A . The kinematics and stability of single-radius versus multi-radius femoral components related to mid-range instability after TKA. J Orthop Res. 2012; 31(1):53-8. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22170. View

5.
Vince K . Mid-flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty: woolly thinking or a real concern?. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(1 Suppl A):84-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36445. View