Associations of Educational and Marketing Messages with Beliefs About Nicotine and Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes

Overview

Journal Prev Med

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Jun 29

PMID 38944058

Authors

Melissa Mercincavage

Olivia A Wackowski

Andrea C Johnson

William J Young

Andy S L Tan

Cristine D Delnevo

Andrew A Strasser

Andrea C Villanti

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Widespread misperceptions about nicotine may have unintended effects on public health. We examined associations between existing messages about nicotine or tobacco and beliefs about nicotine and reduced nicotine cigarettes (RNC).

Methods: 2962 U.S. 18-45-year-olds were randomized in a May 2022 web-based survey to view one of 26 text-based messages about tobacco or nicotine from three sources: ongoing research (n = 8), messages authorized by FDA for VLN cigarettes (n = 6), and FDA's "From Plant to Product to Puff" campaign (n = 12); six messages from FDA's campaign did not reference nicotine and were treated as the reference source. Analyses examined associations between messages, grouped by source and individually, with beliefs about nicotine and RNC addictiveness and harms.

Results: Relative to FDA messages that did not reference nicotine, all message sources were associated with greater odds of a correct belief about nicotine (Odds Ratios [ORs] = 1.40-1.87, p's < 0.01); VLN messages were associated with greater correct beliefs about RNC addictiveness (b = 0.23, p < .05). No campaign produced greater correct beliefs about RNC harms. At the individual level, only five messages were associated with a correct belief about nicotine (ORs = 2.12-2.56, p-values < .01), and one with correct beliefs about RNC harms (b = 1.09, p < .05), vs. the reference message.

Conclusions: Few existing messages improved understanding of the risks of nicotine separately from the risks of combustible products. Communication research is needed to promote greater public understanding of nicotine while minimizing unintended effects on nicotine and tobacco use.

References

Popova L, Owusu D, Nyman A, Weaver S, Yang B, Huang J . Effects of Framing Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes on Anticipated Tobacco Product Use Intentions and Risk Perceptions Among US Adult Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21(Suppl 1):S108-S116. PMC: 6939750. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz146. View

Loud E, Duong H, Henderson K, Reynolds R, Ashley D, Thrasher J . Addicted to smoking or addicted to nicotine? A focus group study on perceptions of nicotine and addiction among US adult current smokers, former smokers, non-smokers and dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Addiction. 2021; 117(2):472-481. PMC: 8733050. DOI: 10.1111/add.15634. View

OBrien E, Roditis M, Persoskie A, Margolis K . Youths' Perceptions of Nicotine Harm and Associations With Product Use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 25(7):1302-1309. PMC: 10256876. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad028. View

Byron M, Jeong M, Abrams D, Brewer N . Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic. Tob Control. 2018; 27(6):712-714. PMC: 6056339. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054124. View

Baig S, Noar S, Gottfredson N, Boynton M, Ribisl K, Brewer N . UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 53(8):732-742. PMC: 6636889. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay080. View

Sawyer L, Brandon T . Unintended Consequences: Testing the Effects of Adolescent-Targeted Anti-vaping Media Upon Adult Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(5):967-974. PMC: 10077926. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac277. View

Czoli C, Fong G, Mays D, Hammond D . How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes. Tob Control. 2016; 26(e1):e49-e58. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053060. View

Zhao X, Alexander T, Hoffman L, Jones C, Delahanty J, Walker M . Youth Receptivity to FDA's The Real Cost Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Evidence From Message Pretesting. J Health Commun. 2016; 21(11):1153-1160. PMC: 5101168. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1233307. View

Byron M, Hall M, King J, Ribisl K, Brewer N . Reducing Nicotine Without Misleading the Public: Descriptions of Cigarette Nicotine Level and Accuracy of Perceptions About Nicotine Content, Addictiveness, and Risk. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21(Suppl 1):S101-S107. PMC: 6939779. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz161. View

10.

Villanti A, West J, Mays D, Donny E, Cappella J, Strasser A . Impact of Brief Nicotine Messaging on Nicotine-Related Beliefs in a U.S. Sample. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57(4):e135-e142. PMC: 6756180. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.015. View

11.

Villanti A, Byron M, Mercincavage M, Pacek L . Misperceptions of Nicotine and Nicotine Reduction: The Importance of Public Education to Maximize the Benefits of a Nicotine Reduction Standard. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21(Suppl 1):S88-S90. PMC: 6939783. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz103. View

12.

OBrien E, Nguyen A, Persoskie A, Hoffman A . U.S. adults' addiction and harm beliefs about nicotine and low nicotine cigarettes. Prev Med. 2016; 96:94-100. PMC: 5328980. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.048. View

13.

King B, Toll B . Commentary on Wackowski et al.: Opportunities and Considerations for Addressing Misperceptions About the Relative Risks of Tobacco Products among Adult Smokers. Addiction. 2023; 118(10):1892-1894. DOI: 10.1111/add.16296. View

14.

Nutt D, Phillips L, Balfour D, Curran H, Dockrell M, Foulds J . Estimating the harms of nicotine-containing products using the MCDA approach. Eur Addict Res. 2014; 20(5):218-25. DOI: 10.1159/000360220. View

15.

Vugrin E, Rostron B, Verzi S, Brodsky N, Brown T, Choiniere C . Modeling the potential effects of new tobacco products and policies: a dynamic population model for multiple product use and harm. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0121008. PMC: 4376806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121008. View

16.

Kraemer J, Strasser A, Lindblom E, Niaura R, Mays D . Crowdsourced data collection for public health: A comparison with nationally representative, population tobacco use data. Prev Med. 2017; 102:93-99. PMC: 5557015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.006. View

17.

Jeong M, Zhang D, Morgan J, Ross J, Osman A, Boynton M . Similarities and Differences in Tobacco Control Research Findings From Convenience and Probability Samples. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 53(5):476-485. PMC: 6339836. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay059. View

18.

Mercincavage M, Lochbuehler K, Villanti A, Wileyto E, Audrain-McGovern J, Strasser A . Examining Risk Perceptions Among Daily Smokers Naïve to Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018; 21(7):985-990. PMC: 6588387. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty082. View

19.

Differding M, Katz S, Strayer L, White C, Strasser A, Donny E . Educating the Public on the Health Risks of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes: Results From a US-Based Convenience Sample. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(6):871-880. PMC: 9048884. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac010. View

20.

Noar S, Rohde J, Prentice-Dunn H, Kresovich A, Hall M, Brewer N . Evaluating the actual and perceived effectiveness of E-cigarette prevention advertisements among adolescents. Addict Behav. 2020; 109:106473. PMC: 7901805. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106473. View