» Articles » PMID: 38941004

Outcomes of Oocyte Retrievals Completed by Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellows Versus Faculty: a 7-year Retrospective Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Jun 28
PMID 38941004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine outcomes of oocyte retrievals completed by Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) fellows versus faculty physicians.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent oocyte retrievals at Mayo Clinic from July 15, 2009, to December 15, 2016. The primary outcome was the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR) calculated per retrieval as the number of oocytes retrieved per follicles aspirated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare follicle and oocyte counts and ORR between fellows and faculty during the same bilateral retrieval.

Results: The study cohort included the first bilateral retrieval from 845 unique patients completed by 11 fellows and seven faculty. The median ORR was not statistically different for fellows and faculty (0.79 versus 0.80, p = 0.46). To assess for a learning curve, the outcomes of seven fellows who completed at least 80 retrievals in their first year were examined as four chronologically ordered sets of 20. When these sets were compared to the faculty physician mean ORR, no significant differences were found (p-values of 0.69, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively).

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in oocyte retrieval rates between fellows versus faculty over a 7-year period, with no significant learning curve observed. These findings suggest that fellows possess the requisite skills for successful oocyte retrieval upon entering REI fellowship following their OB/GYN residency. However, this does not diminish the critical role of comprehensive fellowship training and close supervision, especially in initial and complex cases.

References
1.
. Minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(3):536-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.024. View

2.
DAngelo A, Panayotidis C, Amso N, Marci R, Matorras R, Onofriescu M . Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick up. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2019(4):hoz025. PMC: 6903452. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz025. View

3.
Polyzos N, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H . Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4):661-670.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039. View

4.
Soave I, DAngelo A, Piva I, Marci R . A Pilot Study on Oocyte Retrieval Simulator: A New Tool for Training?. J Med Syst. 2019; 43(7):202. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1340-3. View

5.
Dessolle L, Leperlier F, Biau D, Freour T, Barriere P . Proficiency in oocyte retrieval assessed by the learning curve cumulative summation test. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29(2):187-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.016. View