6.
Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J
. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50.
PMC: 2736161.
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
View
7.
Westerlund A, Sundberg L, Nilsen P
. Implementation of Implementation Science Knowledge: The Research-Practice Gap Paradox. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019; 16(5):332-334.
PMC: 6899530.
DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12403.
View
8.
Metz A, Jensen T, Farley A, Boaz A
. Is implementation research out of step with implementation practice? Pathways to effective implementation support over the last decade. Implement Res Pract. 2023; 3:26334895221105585.
PMC: 9978647.
DOI: 10.1177/26334895221105585.
View
9.
Glasgow R, Vogt T, Boles S
. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9):1322-7.
PMC: 1508772.
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
View
10.
Chambers D, Emmons K
. Navigating the field of implementation science towards maturity: challenges and opportunities. Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):26.
PMC: 10936041.
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01352-0.
View
11.
Glasgow R, Harden S, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith M, Porter G
. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:64.
PMC: 6450067.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064.
View
12.
Glasgow R
. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013; 40(3):257-65.
DOI: 10.1177/1090198113486805.
View
13.
Jensen T, Metz A, Disbennett M, Farley A
. Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners. Implement Res Pract. 2023; 4:26334895231199063.
PMC: 10478532.
DOI: 10.1177/26334895231199063.
View
14.
Shelton R, Brownson R
. Advancing the Science and Application of Implementation Science to Promote Health Equity: Commentary on the Symposium. Annu Rev Public Health. 2023; 45(1):1-5.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062723-055935.
View
15.
Buchanan G, Filiatreau L, Moore J
. Organizing the dissemination and implementation field: who are we, what are we doing, and how should we do it?. Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):38.
PMC: 11007902.
DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00572-1.
View
16.
Morris Z, Wooding S, Grant J
. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011; 104(12):510-20.
PMC: 3241518.
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180.
View
17.
Strifler L, Cardoso R, McGowan J, Cogo E, Nincic V, Khan P
. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 100:92-102.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008.
View
18.
Beidas R, Dorsey S, Lewis C, Lyon A, Powell B, Purtle J
. Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem. Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1):55.
PMC: 9375077.
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01226-3.
View
19.
Meyers D, Durlak J, Wandersman A
. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 50(3-4):462-80.
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.
View