Composite to Clarity: Shifting From Combined to Individual Endpoints in Meta-Analyses of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Chang H, Hung C, Chen Y, Fang C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).
PMID: 39685679 PMC: 11642127. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237221.
References
1.
Montori V, Permanyer-Miralda G, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Busse J, Pacheco-Huergo V, Bryant D
. Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ. 2005; 330(7491):594-6.
PMC: 554039.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.594.
View
2.
Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Busse J, Heels-Ansdell D, Montori V, Akl E, Bryant D
. Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2007; 334(7597):786.
PMC: 1852019.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39136.682083.AE.
View
3.
Zhang Y, Alonso Coello P, Brozek J, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Akl E
. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15(1):52.
PMC: 5412036.
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0621-0.
View
4.
Armstrong P, Westerhout C
. Composite End Points in Clinical Research: A Time for Reappraisal. Circulation. 2017; 135(23):2299-2307.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026229.
View
5.
Navarese E, Lansky A, Kereiakes D, Kubica J, Gurbel P, Gorog D
. Cardiac mortality in patients randomised to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(45):4638-4651.
PMC: 8669551.
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab246.
View