» Articles » PMID: 38938997

Milrinone Vs Dobutamine for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Implications of Renal Function and Injury

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There is a paucity of prospective data examining the efficacy and safety of inotropic therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock and renal dysfunction.

Objectives: This study sought to examine the treatment effect of milrinone compared to dobutamine in relation to renal function.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the DOREMI (Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock) trial, we examined clinical outcomes with milrinone compared to dobutamine after stratification based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60 ml/min/1.73 m and acute kidney injury (AKI). The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death from any cause, resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of a cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, nonfatal myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke, or initiation of renal replacement therapy.

Results: Baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m and AKI were observed in 78 (45%) and 124 (65%) of patients, respectively. The primary outcome and death from any cause occurred in 99 (52%) and 76 (40%) patients, respectively. eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m did not appear to modulate the treatment effect of milrinone compared to dobutamine. In contrast, there was a significant interaction between the treatment effect of milrinone compared to dobutamine and AKI with respect to the primary outcome ( interaction = 0.02) and death ( interaction = 0.04). The interaction was characterized by lower risk of primary outcome and death with milrinone compared to dobutamine in patients without, but not with, AKI.

Conclusions: In patients requiring inotropic support for cardiogenic shock, baseline renal dysfunction and AKI are common. A modulating effect of AKI on the relative efficacy of milrinone compared to dobutamine was observed, characterized by attenuation of a potential clinical benefit with milrinone compared to dobutamine in patients who develop AKI.

Citing Articles

Managing Arrhythmias in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Milrinone and Dobutamine Therapy.

Fletcher J, Poornima Halaharvi S, Manuvel C, Brooks A, Wannakuwatte R, Lucano Gomez E Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76089.

PMID: 39835019 PMC: 11743927. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76089.

References
1.
Hasei M, Uchiyama A, Nishimura M, Mashimo T, Fujino Y . Correlation between plasma milrinone concentration and renal function in patients with cardiac disease. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52(7):991-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01671.x. View

2.
Ronco C, Haapio M, House A, Anavekar N, Bellomo R . Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(19):1527-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.051. View

3.
Harjola V, Lassus J, Sionis A, Kober L, Tarvasmaki T, Spinar J . Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17(5):501-9. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.260. View

4.
Lauridsen M, Gammelager H, Schmidt M, Rasmussen T, Shaw R, Botker H . Acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy and 5-year mortality after myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Crit Care. 2015; 19:452. PMC: 4699352. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-1170-8. View

5.
Ballo P, Chechi T, Spaziani G, Fibbi V, Conti D, Ferro G . Prognostic comparison between creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate formulas for the prediction of 10-year outcome in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017; 7(8):689-702. DOI: 10.1177/2048872617697452. View