» Articles » PMID: 38934679

Randomized Clinical Trial on Safety of the Natriuretic Peptide Ularitide As Treatment of Refractory Cirrhotic Ascites

Overview
Journal Hepatol Commun
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Jun 27
PMID 38934679
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most severe ascites status with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites.

Methods: We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating ularitide to manage refractory ascites. Until trial termination after interim analyses, we randomized 17 participants in a 2:1 ratio between ularitide (n=11) and placebo (n=6). While hospitalized, the participants received treatment for up to 48 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in renal water excretion, and secondary end points included changes in renal sodium excretion rate and body weight. The starting dose was 30 ng/kg/min, though later reduced to 20 for safety reasons.

Results: In contrast to the study hypothesis, the mean urine production decreased after 24 hours of ularitide treatment compared with the baseline level (22.8 vs. 47.5 mL/h, p=0.04) and decreased more in participants randomized to ularitide than placebo (24.7 vs. -6.2 mL/h, p=0.05). Ularitide did not increase the renal sodium excretion rate or reduce the weight gain. The incidence rate ratio of adverse reactions in ularitide versus placebo was 8.5 (95% CI: 2-35, p=0.003). Participants treated with ularitide developed serious blood pressure reductions, impacting their renal responsiveness.

Conclusions: Ularitide in doses of 20-30 ng/kg/min did not benefit urine production and renal sodium excretion rate in patients with refractory ascites. The participants randomized to ularitide overall developed more adverse reactions than placebo. EudraCT no. 2019-002268-28.

References
1.
Biggins S, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, Gines P, Ling S, Nadim M . Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021; 74(2):1014-1048. DOI: 10.1002/hep.31884. View

2.
. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018; 69(2):406-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024. View

3.
LA VILLA G, Riccardi D, Lazzeri C, Casini Raggi V, Dello Sbarba A, Guerra C . Blunted natriuretic response to low-dose brain natriuretic peptide infusion in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites and avid sodium retention. Hepatology. 1995; 22(6):1745-50. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840220620. View

4.
Gantzel R, Kjaer M, Jepsen P, Aagaard N, Watson H, Gluud L . Effects and safety of natriuretic peptides as treatment of cirrhotic ascites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol. 2022; 14(4):827-845. PMC: 9099106. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i4.827. View

5.
Moreau R, Delegue P, Pessione F, Hillaire S, Durand F, Lebrec D . Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Liver Int. 2004; 24(5):457-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2004.0991.x. View