» Articles » PMID: 38929940

XEN45 Implant in Medically Controlled Vs. Uncontrolled Eyes-Differential IOP Changes in Real-Life Conditions

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 27
PMID 38929940
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and complications after XEN45 implants in medically controlled eyes (MCE) vs. medically uncontrolled eyes (MUE). A retrospective study, in a tertiary referral hospital, on mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) cases under topical medication, including 32 eyes with IOP < 21 mmHg (MCE group) and 30 eyes with IOP ≥ 21 mmHg (MUE group). The success criteria using Kaplan-Meier analysis was IOP < 21 mmHg without medications (complete success) or fewer drugs than preoperatively (qualified success) at the last visit, without new surgery or unresolved hypotony. No significant preoperative differences were found between the groups. The mean IOP was 15.6 ± 3.8 mmHg in MCE and 15.1 ± 4.1 mmHg in the MUE group ( > 0.05; Mann-Whitney test) at the end of the follow-up (mean of 26.1 ± 15.6 months and 28.3 ± 15.3 months, respectively) ( = 0.414, Mann-Whitney Test). The device caused a significant IOP reduction at 24 h in both groups. Thereafter, the MCE group significantly tended to increase IOP, recovering baseline values at 1 month and maintaining them until the end of the follow-up. In contrast, in the MUE group, the IOP values tended to be similar after the first reduction. No relevant complications and no significant differences between the groups in the survival analysis were found. XEN45 provided stable IOP control in both the MCE and MUE group without important complications in the medium term. The IOP increasing in the MCE group, after a prior decrease, led to restored baseline values 1 month after surgery. The homeostatic mechanism that causes the rise in the IOP to baseline values and its relationship with failure cases remains to be clarified.

References
1.
Tan S, Walkden A, Au L . One-year result of XEN45 implant for glaucoma: efficacy, safety, and postoperative management. Eye (Lond). 2017; 32(2):324-332. PMC: 5811690. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.162. View

2.
Widder R, Dietlein T, Dinslage S, Kuhnrich P, Rennings C, Rossler G . The XEN45 Gel Stent as a minimally invasive procedure in glaucoma surgery: success rates, risk profile, and rates of re-surgery after 261 surgeries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256(4):765-771. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3899-7. View

3.
Jones L, Maes N, Qidwai U, Ratnarajan G . Impact of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface and quality of life in patients with glaucoma. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2023; 15:25158414231152765. PMC: 10107052. DOI: 10.1177/25158414231152765. View

4.
Hengerer F, Auffarth G, Conrad-Hengerer I . Comparison of Minimally Invasive XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation in Glaucoma Patients Without and With Prior Interventional Therapies. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019; 8(3):447-459. PMC: 6692801. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-0193-7. View

5.
Gillmann K, Bravetti G, Rao H, Mermoud A, Mansouri K . Combined and stand-alone XEN 45 gel stent implantation: 3-year outcomes and success predictors. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020; 99(4):e531-e539. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14605. View