» Articles » PMID: 38929013

Does School Health Promotion Have Additional Value for Educational Performance? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jun 27
PMID 38929013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little information is available regarding the influence of the interplay between the school context and school health promotion on educational performance. Therefore, we examined whether the variation between primary and secondary schools regarding the educational performance of students could be explained by general school characteristics, school population characteristics, and school health promotion and to what extent these factors interact. We performed multilevel analyses using existing data on 7021 primary schools and 1315 secondary schools in the Netherlands from the school years 2010-2011 till 2018-2019. Our outcomes were the final test score from primary education and the average grade of standardized final exams from secondary education. School health promotion was operationalized as having obtained Healthy School (HS) certification. For the test score, 7.17% of the total variation was accounted for by differences at the school level and 4.02% for the average grade. For both outcomes, the percentage of disadvantaged students in a school explained most variation. HS certification did not explain variation, but moderated some associations. We found small to moderate differences between schools regarding educational performance. Compositional differences of school populations, especially socioeconomic status, seemed more important in explaining variation in educational performance than general school characteristics and HS certification. Some associations were moderated by HS certification, but differences remained small in most cases.

Citing Articles

School Health Promotion, the Body Mass Index z-Score, and Psychosocial Health in Primary Schools of the Netherlands.

Vonk L, Eekhout I, Huijts T, Levels M, Jansen M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200682 PMC: 11353774. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081073.

References
1.
Hanson M, Chen E . Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med. 2007; 30(3):263-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-007-9098-3. View

2.
Rasberry C, Lee S, Robin L, Laris B, Russell L, Coyle K . The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Med. 2011; 52 Suppl 1:S10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.027. View

3.
Bartelink N, van Assema P, Kremers S, Savelberg H, Oosterhoff M, Willeboordse M . One- and Two-Year Effects of the Healthy Primary School of the Future on Children's Dietary and Physical Activity Behaviours: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Nutrients. 2019; 11(3). PMC: 6470547. DOI: 10.3390/nu11030689. View

4.
Langford R, Bonell C, Jones H, Pouliou T, Murphy S, Waters E . The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (4):CD008958. PMC: 11214127. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2. View

5.
Romeo R, Leonard J, Robinson S, West M, Mackey A, Rowe M . Beyond the 30-Million-Word Gap: Children's Conversational Exposure Is Associated With Language-Related Brain Function. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(5):700-710. PMC: 5945324. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617742725. View