» Articles » PMID: 38928580

Cognitive Vs. Linguistic Training in Children with Developmental Language Disorder: Exploring Their Effectiveness on Verbal Short-Term Memory and Verbal Working Memory

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jun 27
PMID 38928580
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study explores comparatively the effectiveness of a cognitive (verbal short-term memory (vSTM), verbal working memory (vWM)) and of a linguistic training (10-week duration each) in the diffusion of gains in cognitive abilities (vSTM and vWM) of in school-aged Greek-speaking children with developmental language disorder (DLD). To this purpose, two computerized training programs i.e., a linguistic and a cognitive one, were developed and applied to three groups (A, B, and C) of children with DLD (N = 49, in total). There were three assessments with two vSTM tasks (non-word repetition and forward digit span) and a vWM task (backward digit span): pre-therapeutically (time 1), where no significant between-group differences were found, post-therapeutically I (time 2), and post-therapeutically II (time 3) and two training phases. In phase Ι, group A received meta-syntactic training, whereas group B vSTM/vWM training and group C received no training. In phase ΙΙ, a reversal of treatment was performed for groups A and B: group A received vSTM/vWM while group B meta-syntactic training. Again, group C received no training. Overall, the results indicated a significant performance improvement for the treatment groups and revealed beneficial far-transfer effects as language therapy can affect vSTM and vWM in addition to direct and near transfer effects. In addition, the intervention type order affected performance as follows: first, better performance on the vSTM task (non-word repetition) was shown when the linguistic treatment was delivered first; second, better performance on the vWM in Time 2 and Time 3 was shown by group B, for which the cognitive treatment was delivered first. Concluding, not only intervention type but also intervention type order can affect performance in DLD.

References
1.
Talli I, Kotsoni P, Stavrakaki S, Sprenger-Charolles L . Assessing phonological short-term memory in Greek: Reliability and validity of a non-word repetition test. Front Psychol. 2023; 13:904268. PMC: 9990871. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904268. View

2.
Bettelli G, Guasti M, Ajmone P, Tenca E, Arosio F . The effect of a priming-based training on the production of object clitic pronouns in Italian speaking children with DLD. Clin Linguist Phon. 2023; 38(7):642-675. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2023.2233049. View

3.
Tyler A, Lewis K, Haskill A, Tolbert L . Efficacy and Cross-Domain Effects of a Morphosyntax and a Phonology Intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002; 33(1):52-66. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2002/005). View

4.
Ebert K, Rentmeester-Disher J, Kohnert K . Nonlinguistic cognitive treatment for bilingual children with primary language impairment. Clin Linguist Phon. 2012; 26(6):485-501. PMC: 4063201. DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2012.660226. View

5.
Stanford E, Durrleman S, Delage H . The Effect of Working Memory Training on a Clinical Marker of French-Speaking Children With Developmental Language Disorder. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019; 28(4):1388-1410. DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0238. View