» Articles » PMID: 38926648

The Non-invasive Serum Biomarkers Contributes to Indicate Liver Fibrosis Staging and Evaluate the Progress of Chronic Hepatitis B

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jun 26
PMID 38926648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic abilities of the non-invasive serum biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis staging and evaluate the progress of hepatitis B.

Methods: We enrolled 433 patients with chronic HBV infection had complete medical data available for the study, who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy. The extent of fibrosis was assessed using the modified METAVIR score. The predictive values of the non-invasive serum biomarkers were evaluated by the areas under the receiving operator characteristics curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: The proportion of males with progressive stages of liver fibrosis was relatively larger, and the average age of patients with cirrhosis stages is older than the non-cirrhotic stages. We found PLT, GGT, ALP, TB, FIB4 and GPR to be significantly associated with liver fibrosis in our cohort. GGT showed a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 76.7% in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), with an AUROC of 0.775 (95%CI 0.711-0.840).The AUROCs of the GPR in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3) was 0.794 (95%CI 0.734-0.853), but it had a lower sensitivity of 59.2%. Additionally, GGT, FIB4, and GPR could differentiate advanced fibrosis (F3-4) from non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) among individuals with chronic hepatitis B, with AUROCs of 0.723 (95%CI 0.668-0.777), 0.729 (95%CI 0.675-0.782), and 0.760 (95%CI: 0.709-0.811) respectively.

Conclusions: GGT was a better biomarker to distinguish cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), while GPR was a better biomarker to identify advanced fibrosis (F3-4) and non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Citing Articles

Correlation Between Clinical Indicators and Liver Pathology in Children with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Huang C, Lu Y, Wang Z, Jiang Q, Dong Y, Cao L Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767809 PMC: 11726914. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122903.

References
1.
Lens S, Torres F, Puigvehi M, Marino Z, Londono M, Martinez S . Predicting the development of liver cirrhosis by simple modelling in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 43(3):364-74. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13472. View

2.
Huang R, Wang G, Tian C, Liu Y, Jia B, Wang J . Gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase to platelet ratio is not superior to APRI,FIB-4 and RPR for diagnosing liver fibrosis in CHB patients in China. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):8543. PMC: 5561053. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09234-w. View

3.
Liu D, Lu W, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Ding R, Zhou X . Comparative evaluation of GPR versus APRI and FIB-4 in predicting different levels of liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2017; 25(5):581-589. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12842. View

4.
Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G . Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. J Hepatol. 2003; 39(2):239-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00191-0. View

5.
Bedossa P, Poynard T . An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996; 24(2):289-93. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510240201. View