» Articles » PMID: 38923385

Clinical Perspectives on Surgical Reconstruction of Eccentric Tumors at the Distal Femur with Unicondylar Resection

Overview
Journal Orthop Surg
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Jun 26
PMID 38923385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The distal femur is one of the most common sites for primary bone tumors. As the tumor progresses and bone destruction worsens, it can severely affect knee function and even pose a threat to life. In cases where only one condyle is affected and requires resection, preserving the healthy contralateral condyle can substantially enhance the biomechanics of the knee. Furthermore, preserving bone stock may enable future salvage procedures in the event of initial surgery failure, be it from fractures or osteoarthritis. Distal femoral unicondyle resection can offer better functional outcomes in select cases. However, it is essential to prioritize oncological safety with adequate margins over short-term knee function. Currently, the primary methods for reconstruction after the excision of a unicondylar tumor include allograft transplantation (bi- or uni-condylar) and prosthetic or allograft-prosthesis composite replacement (APC). However, there is currently some controversy regarding the optimal surgical reconstruction method, and a consensus within the academic community has yet to be reached. Moreover, due to the rarity of bone tumors, extensive clinical data from a single center is limited. Current studies are mainly retrospective and single-center, lacking sufficient cases and follow-up duration. This article reviews surgical reconstruction after solitary condylar excision in distal femoral tumors. It summarizes, compares, and analyzes mainstream reconstruction methods, exploring their technical details and clinical outcomes to highlight their potential in bone oncology.

References
1.
Borade A, Kempegowda H, Fernandez M, Horwitz D . Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of post-traumatic defect of distal femur in a pediatric patient: A case report and literature review. Injury. 2016; 47(11):2473-2478. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.015. View

2.
Power R, Wood D, Tomford W, Mankin H . Revision osteoarticular allograft transplantation in weight-bearing joints. A clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(4):595-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071641. View

3.
Gherlinzoni F, Picci P, Bacci G, Campanacci D . Limb sparing versus amputation in osteosarcoma. Correlation between local control, surgical margins and tumor necrosis: Istituto Rizzoli experience. Ann Oncol. 1992; 3 Suppl 2:S23-7. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/3.suppl_2.s23. View

4.
Niu X, Zhang Q, Hao L, Ding Y, Li Y, Xu H . Giant cell tumor of the extremity: retrospective analysis of 621 Chinese patients from one institution. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(5):461-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01922. View

5.
Marcove R, Abou Zahr K, Huvos A, Ogihara W . Cryosurgery in osteogenic sarcoma: report of three cases. Compr Ther. 1984; 10(1):52-60. View