Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Initial Weeks Post-stroke: a Pilot Randomized Study

Overview

Journal Einstein (Sao Paulo)

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Jun 26

PMID 38922218

Authors

Marcela Tengler Carvalho Takahashi

Joana Bisol Balardin

Paulo Rodrigo Bazan

Danielle de Sa Boasquevisque

Edson Amaro Junior

Adriana Bastos Conforto

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed at assessing the alterations in upper limb motor impairment and connectivity between motor areas following the post-stroke delivery of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions.

Methods: Modifications in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores, connectivity between the primary motor cortex of the unaffected and affected hemispheres, and between the primary motor and premotor cortices of the unaffected hemisphere were compared prior to and following six sessions of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation application in 13 patients (active = 6; sham = 7); this modality targets the primary motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere early after a stroke.

Results: Clinically relevant distinctions in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores (≥9 points) were observed more frequently in the Sham Group than in the Active Group. Between-group differences in the alterations in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores were not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test, p=0.133). ROI-to-ROI correlations between the primary motor cortices of the affected and unaffected hemispheres post-therapeutically increased in 5/6 and 2/7 participants in the Active and Sham Groups, respectively. Between-group differences in modifications in connectivity between the aforementioned areas were not statistically significant. Motor performance enhancements were more frequent in the Sham Group compared to the Active Group.

Conclusion: The results of this hypothesis-generating investigation suggest that heightened connectivity may not translate into early clinical benefits following a stroke and will be crucial in designing larger cohort studies to explore mechanisms underlying the impacts of this intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02455427.

References

Du J, Yao W, Li J, Yang F, Hu J, Xu Q . Motor Network Reorganization After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Early Stroke Patients: A Resting State fMRI Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021; 36(1):61-68. DOI: 10.1177/15459683211054184. View

Boasquevisque D, Servinsckins L, de Paiva J, Dos Santos D, Soares P, Pires D . Contralesional Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Enhance Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Neural Plast. 2021; 2021:8858394. PMC: 8380180. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8858394. View

Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou A, Jiang J, Adnan T . Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(5):641-661. PMC: 5007190. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. View

Alia C, Spalletti C, Lai S, Panarese A, Lamola G, Bertolucci F . Neuroplastic Changes Following Brain Ischemia and their Contribution to Stroke Recovery: Novel Approaches in Neurorehabilitation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017; 11:76. PMC: 5352696. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00076. View

Nitsche M, Cohen L, Wassermann E, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A . Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2010; 1(3):206-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. View

Vahdat S, Darainy M, Milner T, Ostry D . Functionally specific changes in resting-state sensorimotor networks after motor learning. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(47):16907-15. PMC: 3260885. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2737-11.2011. View

Bestmann S, Swayne O, Blankenburg F, Ruff C, Teo J, Weiskopf N . The role of contralesional dorsal premotor cortex after stroke as studied with concurrent TMS-fMRI. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(36):11926-37. PMC: 3044467. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5642-09.2010. View

de Haan B, Clas P, Juenger H, Wilke M, Karnath H . Fast semi-automated lesion demarcation in stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 9:69-74. PMC: 4543214. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.013. View

Golestani A, Tymchuk S, Demchuk A, Goodyear B . Longitudinal evaluation of resting-state FMRI after acute stroke with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 27(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1177/1545968312457827. View

10.

Karabanov A, Ziemann U, Hamada M, George M, Quartarone A, Classen J . Consensus Paper: Probing Homeostatic Plasticity of Human Cortex With Non-invasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(5):993-1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.017. View

11.

Di X, Gohel S, Kim E, Biswal B . Task vs. rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:493. PMC: 3775427. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00493. View

12.

Dobkin B . Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(16):1677-84. PMC: 4106469. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp043511. View

13.

Pires D, Boasquevisque D, Speciali D, Silva G, Conforto A . Success of promotion strategies for a stroke rehabilitation protocol. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018; 64(5):443-447. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.05.443. View

14.

Chen J, Schlaug G . Increased resting state connectivity between ipsilesional motor cortex and contralesional premotor cortex after transcranial direct current stimulation with physical therapy. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23271. PMC: 4793190. DOI: 10.1038/srep23271. View

15.

Pruvost-Robieux E, Benzakoun J, Turc G, Marchi A, Mancusi R, Lamy C . Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2021; 52(6):1951-1960. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032056. View

16.

Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V . Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2095-128. PMC: 10790329. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. View

17.

Russo C, Souza Carneiro M, Bolognini N, Fregni F . Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke. Neuromodulation. 2017; 20(3):215-222. PMC: 5389927. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12574. View

18.

Arya K, Verma R, Garg R . Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011; 18 Suppl 1:599-610. DOI: 10.1310/tsr18s01-599. View

19.

Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu T . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007; 37(1):90-101. PMC: 2214855. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042. View

20.

Caballero-Gaudes C, Reynolds R . Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal. Neuroimage. 2016; 154:128-149. PMC: 5466511. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018. View