Documenting Compliance and Symptom Reactivity for Ambulatory Assessment Methodology Following Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility of the Mobile Neurocognitive Health (MNCH) Project

Overview

Journal J Head Trauma Rehabil

Specialties Emergency Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 Jun 26

PMID 38922030

Authors

R J Elbin

Kori J Durfee

Melissa N Womble

Sabrina Jennings

Sheri Fedor

Christina M Dollar

John M Felt

Daniel B Elbich

Jonathan G Hakun

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience ratings for an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol involving ultra-brief ambulatory cognitive assessments in adolescent and young adult patients with concussion.

Setting: Outpatient concussion clinic.

Participants: 116 patients aged 13 to 25 years with concussion.

Design: Prospective research design was used to examine compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience for the Mobile Neurocognitive Health Project (MNCH); an EMA study of environmental exposures, symptoms, objective cognitive functioning, and symptom reactivity involving 4, daily EMA surveys (7:30 am , 10:30 am , 3:00 pm , 8:00 pm ) for a period of 7 days following concussion. Overall compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, and participant acceptability/experience ratings were described. A series of non-parametric Friedman Tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine differences in compliance and reactivity related to time of day and over the course of the protocol (first 3 days [Early Week] vs last 4 days [Late Week]).

Main Measures: Compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, participant experience/acceptability.

Results: Overall median compliance was 71%, and there were significantly fewer 7:30 am surveys completed compared to the 10:30 am ( Z = -4 .88, P ≤ .001), 3:00 pm ( Z = -4 .13, P ≤ .001), and 8:00 pm ( Z = -4 .68, P ≤ .001) surveys. Compliance for Early Week surveys were significantly higher than Late Week ( Z = -2 .16, P = .009). The median symptom reactivity score was 34.39 out of 100 and was significantly higher for Early Week compared to Late Week ( Z = -4 .59, P ≤ .001). Ninety-nine percent (89/90) of the sample agreed that the app was easy to use, and 18% (16/90) indicated that the app interfered with their daily life.

Conclusion: Adolescents and young adults with concussion were compliant with the MNCH EMA protocol. Symptom reactivity to the protocol was low and the majority of participants reported that the app and protocol were acceptable. These findings support further investigation into applications of EMA for use in concussion studies.

References

Elbin R, Eagle S, Marchetti G, Anderson M, Schatz P, Womble M . Using change scores on the vestibular ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool to identify concussion in adolescents. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2021; 11(4):591-597. DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2021.1911806. View

Leddy J, Kozlowski K, Donnelly J, Pendergast D, Epstein L, Willer B . A preliminary study of subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2010; 20(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181c6c22c. View

Mucha A, Collins M, Elbin R, Furman J, Troutman-Enseki C, DeWolf R . A Brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(10):2479-86. PMC: 4209316. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514543775. View

Lovell M, Iverson G, Collins M, Podell K, Johnston K, Pardini D . Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2007; 13(3):166-74. DOI: 10.1207/s15324826an1303_4. View

Kontos A, Sufrinko A, Sandel N, Emami K, Collins M . Sport-related Concussion Clinical Profiles: Clinical Characteristics, Targeted Treatments, and Preliminary Evidence. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019; 18(3):82-92. DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000573. View

Cairncross M, Yeates K, Tang K, Madigan S, Beauchamp M, Craig W . Early Postinjury Screen Time and Concussion Recovery. Pediatrics. 2022; 150(5). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056835. View

Macnow T, Curran T, Mannix R . Understanding the True Effect of Screen Time on Recovery From Concussion. Pediatrics. 2022; 150(5). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-058835. View

Martin A, Petersen A, Sesma H, Koolmo M, Ingram K, Slifko K . Learning and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders as Risk Factors for Prolonged Concussion Recovery in Children and Adolescents. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021; 28(2):109-122. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617721000229. View

Leddy J, Hinds A, Miecznikowski J, Darling S, Matuszak J, Baker J . Safety and Prognostic Utility of Provocative Exercise Testing in Acutely Concussed Adolescents: A Randomized Trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 28(1):13-20. PMC: 5739074. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000431. View

10.

Kontos A, Elbin R, Lau B, Simensky S, Freund B, French J . Posttraumatic migraine as a predictor of recovery and cognitive impairment after sport-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(7):1497-504. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513488751. View

11.

Patricios J, Schneider K, Dvorak J, Ahmed O, Blauwet C, Cantu R . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport-Amsterdam, October 2022. Br J Sports Med. 2023; 57(11):695-711. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106898. View

12.

Lewandowski L, Rieger B, Smyth J, Perry L, Gathje R . Measuring post-concussion symptoms in adolescents: feasibility of ecological momentary assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24(8):791-6. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp087. View

13.

McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Bailes J, Broglio S . Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5 international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51(11):838-847. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699. View

14.

Emons W, Habibovic M, Pedersen S . Prevalence of anxiety in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: measurement equivalence of the HADS-A and the STAI-S. Qual Life Res. 2019; 28(11):3107-3116. PMC: 6803579. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02237-2. View

15.

Meehan 3rd W, Mannix R, Monuteaux M, Stein C, Bachur R . Early symptom burden predicts recovery after sport-related concussion. Neurology. 2014; 83(24):2204-10. PMC: 4277671. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001073. View

16.

Elbin R, Womble M, Elbich D, Dollar C, Fedor S, Hakun J . Ambulatory Assessment in Concussion Clinical Care and Rehabilitation. Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:924965. PMC: 9260167. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.924965. View

17.

Collins M, Kontos A, Reynolds E, Murawski C, Fu F . A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 22(2):235-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2791-6. View

18.

Sliwinski M, Mogle J, Hyun J, Munoz E, Smyth J, Lipton R . Reliability and Validity of Ambulatory Cognitive Assessments. Assessment. 2016; 25(1):14-30. PMC: 5690878. DOI: 10.1177/1073191116643164. View

19.

Wolpe J, Lang P . A FEAR SURVEY SCHEDULE FOR USE IN BEHAVIOUR THERAPY. Behav Res Ther. 1964; 2:27-30. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90051-8. View

20.

Sufrinko A, Howie E, Charek D, Elbin R, Collins M, Kontos A . Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment of Postconcussion Symptoms and Recovery Outcomes. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019; 34(6):E40-E48. DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000474. View