» Articles » PMID: 38920881

Efficacy of the Sausage Technique in Rebuilding the Crestal Buccal Bone Thickness: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Journal Dent J (Basel)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Jun 26
PMID 38920881
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal was to evaluate the efficacy of the sausage technique in reconstructing the crestal buccal bone thickness, focusing on the distribution shape of the regenerated volume. Ten implants were placed in five patients with Cawood-Howell class IV defects. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was executed at T0 (before surgery). Guided bone regeneration (GBR) with the sausage technique utilized a resorbable collagen membrane, made of a 50% autologous bone and a 50% anorganic bovine bone matrix (ABBM) mixture. After 6 months, a CBCT (T1) was performed before implant placement. Using CBCT software, a plane parallel to the implant axis intersected perpendicular planes every 1.5 mm from the crest level. T0 and T1 CBCT sections were analyzed, yielding 140 measurements. Statistical analysis via SPSS revealed a significant increase in thickness (average 2.82 ± 1.79 mm). Maximum gains occurred at 4.5 mm from the coronal crest line (3.8 ± 1.51 mm). The GBR sausage technique was effective with minimal post-operative complications, yielding the biggest gain at the mid-ridge sagittal area. Within the analysis limitations, it can be assumed that the sausage technique is effective for horizontal GBR in the maxilla, but a lesser volume might be achieved at the crestal level because it seems to follow a bowed regeneration shape.

References
1.
Crespi R, Toti P, Covani U, Crespi G, Menchini-Fabris G . Maxillary and Mandibular Split Crest Technique with Immediate Implant Placement: A 5-Year Cone Beam Retrospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021; 36(5):999-1007. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8572. View

2.
Maiorana C, Beretta M, Salina S, Santoro F . Reduction of autogenous bone graft resorption by means of bio-oss coverage: a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25(1):19-25. View

3.
Soldatos N, Stylianou P, Koidou V, Angelov N, Yukna R, Romanos G . Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration. Quintessence Int. 2016; 48(2):131-147. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a37133. View

4.
Meloni S, Jovanovic S, Urban I, Baldoni E, Pisano M, Tallarico M . Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulate xenograft and autologous bone: A 3-year after final loading prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(4):669-677. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12808. View

5.
Cordaro L, Amade D, Cordaro M . Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13(1):103-11. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x. View