» Articles » PMID: 38920731

Oncologists' Satisfaction with Virtual Care: A Questionnaire

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jun 26
PMID 38920731
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Although virtual care (VC) has become an integral part of oncology care and healthcare delivery, clinicians' perspectives on and satisfaction with this modality are not well understood.

Methods: Using a National Network Forum framework and expert panel review, we developed a questionnaire to measure oncologists' satisfaction with VC. The questionnaire was distributed to Canadian oncologists through medical society email lists (n = 1541). We used a 5-point Likert scale to capture their responses, which included strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), undecided (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5).

Results: A total of 61 oncologists and/or oncology trainees, of 768 (7.9%) who opened their email, completed questionnaires between October 2022 and January 2023. Every questionnaire item had a response rate greater than 98%. Seventy-two percent of the respondents were satisfied with VC. Oncologists who were less comfortable with technology were more likely to report lower levels of satisfaction ( < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum). The questionnaire items that received the highest levels of agreement were related to VC reducing costs and improving access for patients and concerns about missing a diagnosis and assessing patients' functional status. The questionnaire items that received the greatest disagreement were related to VC improving access for patients with language barriers, VC being associated with time-savings for clinicians, improvements in clinical efficacy, and more readily available lab tests.

Conclusions: Most of the oncologists surveyed are satisfied with VC; however, there are some concerns with VC that need to be addressed. Future research on optimizing VC should address clinicians' concerns, in addition to addressing the patient experience.

References
1.
Larson J, Rosen A, Wilson F . The Effect of Telehealth Interventions on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2017; 24(6):397-405. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0112. View

2.
Li J, Liu Y, Jiang J, Peng X, Hu X . Effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021; 122:103970. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103970. View

3.
Bhatia R, Chu C, Pang A, Tadrous M, Stamenova V, Cram P . Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2021; 9(1):E107-E114. PMC: 8034297. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200311. View

4.
Roberts T, Lennes I . Lessons for Oncology From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Operationalizing and Scaling Virtual Cancer Care in Health Systems. Cancer J. 2022; 28(2):125-133. PMC: 9158540. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000579. View

5.
Singh S, Fletcher G, Yao X, Sussman J . Virtual Care in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol. 2021; 28(5):3488-3506. PMC: 8482228. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050301. View