» Articles » PMID: 38916650

Short-term Adaptation As a Tool to Improve Bioethanol Production Using Grass Press-juice As Fermentation Medium

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grass raw materials collected from grasslands cover more than 30% of Europe's agricultural area. They are considered very attractive for the production of different biochemicals and biofuels due to their high availability and renewability. In this study, a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was exploited for second-generation bioethanol production. Grass press-cake and grass press-juice were separated using mechanical pretreatment, and the obtained juice was used as a fermentation medium. In this work, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was utilized for bioethanol production using the grass press-juice as the sole fermentation medium. The yeast was able to release about 11 g/L of ethanol in 72 h, with a total production yield of 0.38 ± 0.2 g/g. It was assessed to improve the fermentation ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using the short-term adaptation. For this purpose, the yeast was initially propagated in increasing the concentration of press-juice. Then, the yeast cells were re-cultivated in 100%(v/v) fresh juice to verify if it had improved the fermentation efficiency. The fructose conversion increased from 79 to 90%, and the ethanol titers reached 18 g/L resulting in a final yield of 0.50 ± 0.06 g/g with a volumetric productivity of 0.44 ± 0.00 g/Lh. The overall results proved that short-term adaptation was successfully used to improve bioethanol production with S. cerevisiae using grass press-juice as fermentation medium. KEY POINTS: • Mechanical pretreatment of grass raw materials • Production of bioethanol using grass press-juice as fermentation medium • Short-term adaptation as a tool to improve the bioethanol production.

Citing Articles

Simultaneous production of biofuel from agricultural wastes and bioremediation of the waste substrates: A review.

Ahamefule C, Osilo C, Ahamefule B, Madueke S, Moneke A Curr Res Microb Sci. 2024; 7:100305.

PMID: 39620096 PMC: 11607652. DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100305.

References
1.
Wallace-Salinas V, Gorwa-Grauslund M . Adaptive evolution of an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for combined tolerance to inhibitors and temperature. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013; 6(1):151. PMC: 4015299. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-151. View

2.
Zhang S, Zeng X, Ren M, Mao X, Qiao S . Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017; 8:10. PMC: 5260006. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-016-0139-z. View

3.
Berthels N, Cordero Otero R, Bauer F, Pretorius I, Thevelein J . Correlation between glucose/fructose discrepancy and hexokinase kinetic properties in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 77(5):1083-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1231-2. View

4.
Tomas-Pejo E, Olsson L . Influence of the propagation strategy for obtaining robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells that efficiently co-ferment xylose and glucose in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Microb Biotechnol. 2015; 8(6):999-1005. PMC: 4621452. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12280. View

5.
Meijer M, Boonstra J, Verkleij A, Verrips C . Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(37):24102-7. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24102. View