» Articles » PMID: 38915386

Construction of a Nomogram for Predicting Catheter-related Bladder Discomfort in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease After Renal Transplantation: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2024 Jun 25
PMID 38915386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The incidence of catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is relatively high in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent renal transplantation (RT). This study was designed to establish a nomogram for predicting CRBD after RT among ESRD patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected 269 ESRD patients who underwent RT between September 2019 and August 2023 in our hospital. The patients were divided into training set ( = 215) and test set ( = 54) based on a ratio of 8:2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify the risk factors associated with CRBD after RT, and then a nomogram model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predicting efficiency of the established nomogram.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aberrant body mass index (BMI) (underweight: OR = 5.25; 95% CI [1.25-22.15],  = 0.024; overweight: OR = 2.75; 95% CI [1.17-6.49],  = 0.021), anuria (OR = 2.86; 95% CI [1.33-5.88]) and application of double J (DJ) stent with a diameter of >5Fr (OR = 15.88; 95% CI [6.47-39.01],  < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CRBD after RT. In contrast, sufentanil utilization (>100 µg) [OR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.17-0.88],  = 0.023] was associated with decreased incidence of CRBD. A nomogram was then established based on these parameters for predicting the occurrence of CRBD after RT. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) values and calibration curves confirmed the prediction efficiency of the nomogram.

Conclusion: A nomogram was established for predicting CRBD after RT in ESRD patients, which showed good prediction efficiency based on AUC and calibration curves.

References
1.
Bai Y, Wang X, Li X, Pu C, Yuan H, Tang Y . Management of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Patients Who Underwent Elective Surgery. J Endourol. 2014; 29(6):640-9. PMC: 4490590. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0670. View

2.
Al-Shaiji T, Radomski S . Relationship between Body Mass Index and Overactive Bladder in Women and Correlations with Urodynamic Evaluation. Int Neurourol J. 2012; 16(3):126-31. PMC: 3469831. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2012.16.3.126. View

3.
Cho S, Huh I, Lee S, Sung T, Ku G, Cho C . Effects of dexamethasone on catheter-related bladder discomfort and emergence agitation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021; 75(1):71-78. PMC: 8831440. DOI: 10.4097/kja.21284. View

4.
Lim N, Yoon H . Factors Predicting Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Surgical Patients. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017; 32(5):400-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.03.012. View

5.
Bach H, Kaasby K, Sorensen A, Lofqvist S, Laursen B . Incidence and Severity of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort Among Nonurological Adult Patients in a Postanesthesia Care Unit. J Perianesth Nurs. 2019; 35(1):29-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.06.013. View