Comparison of Tibial Fracture Plate Length, Placement, and Fibular Integrity Effects on Plate Integrity Through Finite Element Analysis

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis is the most commonly used minimally invasive surgery technique for tibial fractures, possibly involving single or dual plate methods. Herein, we performed a finite element analysis to investigate plate strength according to the plate type, length, and presence of a fibula by constructing a three-dimensional tibia model. A thickness of 20 mm was cut 50 mm distal from the lateral plateau, and the ligaments were created. Plates were modeled with lengths of 150, 200, and 250 mm and mounted to the tibia. Screws were arranged to avoid overlapping in the dual plating. The von-Mises stress applied to the plates was measured by applying a load of 1 body weight. Dual plates showed the least stress with low displacement, followed by medial and lateral plates. As the plate length increased, the average stress gradually decreased, increasing plate safety. The difference in the influence of the fibula depending on the presence of proximal fibula osteotomy showed that the average stress increased by 35% following proximal fibula osteotomy in the D1(Plate type: Dual plate, Medial plate length: 150 mm, Lateral plate length: 200 mm, Non Proximal fibula osteotomy) and D1P(Plate type: Dual plate, Medial plate length: 150 mm, Lateral plate length: 200 mm, Proximal fibula osteotomy) models, confirming the necessity of the fibula model. There is no consensus guideline for treatment of this kind of fracture case. A single fracture plate can decrease the risk of skin damage, ligament damage, and wound infection, but because of its design, it cannot provide sufficient stability and satisfactory reduction of the condylar fragment, especially in cases of comminution or coronal fracture. So, these results will help clinicians make an informed choice on which plate to use in patients with tibial fractures.