» Articles » PMID: 38911633

Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass As Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Open
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Jun 24
PMID 38911633
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study compared the effectiveness of 4 main revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), on the reimbursement of antidiabetic treatments in France.

Background: Few large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed the changes in antidiabetic treatments after RBS.

Method: This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance Database. All patients who underwent primary SG and AGB in France between January 2012 and December 2014 were included and followed up until December 31, 2020. The changes in categories and costs of reimbursed antidiabetic treatments across different RBS sequences were assessed (presented as follows: bariatric surgery (BS)-RBS).

Results: Among the 107,088 patients who underwent BS, 6396 underwent RBS, 2400 SG-GBP (SG converted to gastric bypass [GBP] during follow-up), 2277 AGB-SG, 1173 AGB-GBP, and 546 SG-SG. Pre-RBS insulin was used in 10 (2.9%), 4 (0.9%), 8 (2.4%), and 10 (2.6%) patients, respectively. Two years after RBS, the treatment discontinuation or decrease (the change of treatment to a lighter one category rates [eg, insulin to bi/tritherapy]) was 47%, 47%, 49%, and 34%, respectively. Four years after RBS, the median annual cost per patient compared with baseline was lower ( < 0.01) for all sequences, except SG-SG ( = 0.24). The most notable effect concerned AGB-GBP (median of more than 220 euros to 0).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the positive impact of RBS over a 4-year follow-up period on antidiabetic treatments reimbursement, through the reduction or discontinuation of treatments and a significant decrease in costs per patient.

References
1.
Kim D, Arterburn D, Sullivan S, Basu A . Economic Value of Greater Access to Bariatric Procedures for Patients With Severe Obesity and Diabetes. Med Care. 2018; 56(7):583-588. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000924. View

2.
Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Barsamian C, Corigliano N, Beauchet A, Poitou C . Similar postoperative safety between primary and revisional gastric bypass for failed gastric banding. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(8):780-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.625. View

3.
Lazzati A . Epidemiology of the surgical management of obesity. J Visc Surg. 2023; 160(2S):S3-S6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.12.004. View

4.
Thereaux J, Lesuffleur T, Czernichow S, Basdevant A, Msika S, Nocca D . Association Between Bariatric Surgery and Rates of Continuation, Discontinuation, or Initiation of Antidiabetes Treatment 6 Years Later. JAMA Surg. 2018; 153(6):526-533. PMC: 5875344. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6163. View

5.
Thereaux J, Lesuffleur T, Czernichow S, Basdevant A, Msika S, Nocca D . Multicentre cohort study of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy cessation after bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2018; 106(3):286-295. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10999. View