» Articles » PMID: 38910144

Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacological Prophylaxis for Chronic Migraine: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 23
PMID 38910144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) significantly impacts both the physical and mental health of patients. Current studies on the safety and effectiveness of different pharmacological prophylaxis interventions for CM are limited. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of various drugs in preventing CM.

Methods: Two independent researchers systematically searched four databases from their inception to August 1, 2023, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subsequently, they performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A NMA was then performed. Continuous outcomes and binary outcomes were displayed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR), respectively, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each intervention separately.

Results: 24 RCTs involving 8789 patients were included. Compared to placebo, Botulinum toxin A demonstrated the most significant effect in reducing the monthly migraine days for CM patients (MD = 3.88, 95% CI 0.48, 7.28); in terms of improving the response rate by a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days, Topiramate (RR = 50.06, 95% CI 3.18, 787.30) was the most effective; there was no statistically significant difference between all preventive drugs and placebo in improving the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score; in terms of the incidence of adverse events, Eptinezumab (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.8, 1.54) exhibited the highest safety profile.

Conclusion: Among all the drugs for the preventive drugs for CM, Botulinum toxin A has the best efficacy and safety profile, closely followed by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

Citing Articles

Botulinum Toxin and Migraine: Goals and Perspectives.

Prudenzano M Toxins (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 39728788 PMC: 11679156. DOI: 10.3390/toxins16120530.

References
1.
Lipton R, Seng E, Chu M, Reed M, Fanning K, Manack Adams A . The Effect of Psychiatric Comorbidities on Headache-Related Disability in Migraine: Results From the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study. Headache. 2021; 60(8):1683-1696. PMC: 7496280. DOI: 10.1111/head.13914. View

2.
May A, Schulte L . Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016; 12(8):455-64. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.93. View

3.
Buse D, Manack A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton R . Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81(4):428-32. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492. View

4.
Buse D, Reed M, Fanning K, Bostic R, Dodick D, Schwedt T . Comorbid and co-occurring conditions in migraine and associated risk of increasing headache pain intensity and headache frequency: results of the migraine in America symptoms and treatment (MAST) study. J Headache Pain. 2020; 21(1):23. PMC: 7053108. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-1084-y. View

5.
Agostoni E, Barbanti P, Calabresi P, Colombo B, Cortelli P, Frediani F . Current and emerging evidence-based treatment options in chronic migraine: a narrative review. J Headache Pain. 2019; 20(1):92. PMC: 6734211. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-019-1038-4. View