» Articles » PMID: 38904923

The Serum LDH Level and KELIM Scores Are Potential Predictors of a Benefit from Bevacizumab First-line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jun 21
PMID 38904923
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The survival benefit of first-line treatment with bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer patients are multifaceted. In our study, we aimed to identify potential markers of bevacizumab efficacy to help predict which patients would experience survival benefits.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 114 patients examined from January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2023, and data on clinical, biological, and imaging variables, such as ascites, serum LDH, and CA125, were extracted from electronic medical records. We performed a correlation analysis and principal component analysis to investigate correlations among variables and reduce their dimensionality. Then, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of progression-free survival.

Results: Favorable KELIM score (≥ 1, HR 0.376, 95% CI [0.202-0.700], p = 0.002), which indicated better chemosensitivity, and lower LDH levels (≤ 210 U/L, HR 38.73, 95% CI [6.108-245.6], p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of a treatment benefit with bevacizumab in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Regardless of LDH level, patients with favorable KELIM scores had a higher progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (p = 0.18). Among patients with unfavorable KELIM scores, those with higher LDH levels had the lowest PFS benefit (median: 11.5 months, p = 0.0059).

Conclusion: Patients with poor chemosensitivity and low LDH levels are more likely to benefit from first-line bevacizumab treatment. The combination of the two markers can be a helpful predictor of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment and a guide for treatment decisions-making. Retrospectively registered: 2020-MD-371, 2020.10.12.

References
1.
Ileiwat Z, Tabish T, Zinovkin D, Yuzugulen J, Arghiani N, Pranjol M . The mechanistic immunosuppressive role of the tumour vasculature and potential nanoparticle-mediated therapeutic strategies. Front Immunol. 2022; 13:976677. PMC: 9423123. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.976677. View

2.
Viallard C, Larrivee B . Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis. 2017; 20(4):409-426. DOI: 10.1007/s10456-017-9562-9. View

3.
Goel S, Duda D, Xu L, Munn L, Boucher Y, Fukumura D . Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91(3):1071-121. PMC: 3258432. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2010. View

4.
Burger R, Brady M, Bookman M, Fleming G, Monk B, Huang H . Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(26):2473-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104390. View

5.
Perren T, Swart A, Pfisterer J, Ledermann J, Pujade-Lauraine E, Kristensen G . A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(26):2484-96. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103799. View