» Articles » PMID: 38904744

Establishment and Validation of a Novel Disulfidptosis-related Immune Checkpoint Gene Signature in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Discov Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jun 21
PMID 38904744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent subtype of renal tumors and is associated with a unfavorable prognosis. Disulfidptosis is a recently identified form of cell death mediated by disulfide bonds. Numerous studies have highlighted the significance of immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) in ccRCC. Nevertheless, the involvement of disulfidptosis-related immune checkpoint genes (DRICGs) in ccRCC remains poorly understood.

Methods: The mRNA expression profiles and clinicopathological data of ccRCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The associations between disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) and immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) were assessed to identify DRICGs. Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis were conducted to construct a risk signature.

Results: A total of 39 differentially expressed immune-related candidate genes were identified. A prognostic signature was constructed utilizing nine DRICGs (CD276, CD80, CD86, HLA-E, LAG3, PDCD1LG2, PVR, TIGIT, and TNFRSF4) and validated using GEO data. The risk model functioned as an independent prognostic indicator for ccRCC, while the associated nomogram provided a reliable scoring system for ccRCC. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated enrichment of phospholipase D, antigen processing and presentation, and ascorbate and aldarate metabolism-related signaling pathways in the high-risk group. Furthermore, the DRICGs exhibited correlations with the infiltration of various immune cells. It is noteworthy that patients with ccRCC categorized into distinct risk groups based on this model displayed varying sensitivities to potential therapeutic agents.

Conclusions: The novel DRICG-based risk signature is a reliable indicator for the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Moreover, it also aids in drug selection and correlates with the tumour immune microenvironment in ccRCC.

References
1.
Choueiri T, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon M, Zurawski B . Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(9):829-841. PMC: 8436591. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982. View

2.
Lucarelli G, Rutigliano M, Loizzo D, di Meo N, Lasorsa F, Mastropasqua M . MUC1 Tissue Expression and Its Soluble Form CA15-3 Identify a Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with Distinct Metabolic Profile and Poor Clinical Outcome. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(22). PMC: 9696833. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213968. View

3.
Okita K, Hatakeyama S, Tanaka T, Ikehata Y, Tanaka T, Fujita N . Impact of Disagreement Between Two Risk Group Models on Prognosis in Patients With Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 17(3):e440-e446. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.006. View

4.
Hu F, Liu C, Liu L, Zhang Q, Guo A . Expression profile of immune checkpoint genes and their roles in predicting immunotherapy response. Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(3). DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa176. View

5.
Lucarelli G, Netti G, Rutigliano M, Lasorsa F, Loizzo D, Milella M . MUC1 Expression Affects the Immunoflogosis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Microenvironment through Complement System Activation and Immune Infiltrate Modulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5). PMC: 10003656. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054814. View