» Articles » PMID: 38903584

Regional Differences in Heart Failure Risk in the United Kingdom Are Partially Explained by Biological Aging

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jun 21
PMID 38903584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) risk is greater in rural versus urban regions in the United States (US), potentially due to differences in healthcare coverage and access. Whether this excess risk applies to countries with universal healthcare is unclear and the underlying biological mechanisms are unknown. In the prospective United Kingdom (UK) Biobank, we investigated urban-rural regional differences in HF risk and the mechanistic role of biological aging.

Methods: Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident HF in relation to residential urban-rural region and a Biological Health Score (BHS) that reflects biological aging from environmental, social, or dietary stressors. We estimated the proportion of the total effect of urban-rural region on HF mediated through BHS.

Results: Among 417,441 European participants, 10,332 incident HF cases were diagnosed during the follow-up. Compared to participants in large urban regions of Scotland, those in England/Wales had significantly increased HF risk (smaller urban: HR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.64-2.03; suburban: HR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.56-2.01; very rural: HR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.39-1.85). Additionally, we found a dose-response relationship between increased biological aging and HF risk (HR = 1.14 (95%CI: 1.12-1.17). Increased biological aging mediated a notable 6.6% ( < 0.001) of the total effect of urban-rural region on HF.

Conclusion: Despite universal healthcare in the UK, disparities in HF risk by region were observed and may be partly explained by environmental, social, or dietary factors related to biological aging. Our study contributes to precision public health by informing potential biological targets for intervention.

References
1.
Karimi M, Castagne R, Delpierre C, Albertus G, Berger E, Vineis P . Early-life inequalities and biological ageing: a multisystem Biological Health Score approach in . J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019; 73(8):693-702. PMC: 6678052. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-212010. View

2.
Cross S, Mehra M, Bhatt D, Nasir K, ODonnell C, Califf R . Rural-Urban Differences in Cardiovascular Mortality in the US, 1999-2017. JAMA. 2020; 323(18):1852-1854. PMC: 7218488. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2047. View

3.
Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, Rayner M, Townsend N . The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart. 2015; 101(15):1182-9. PMC: 4515998. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307516. View

4.
Lara K, Levitan E, Gutierrez O, Shikany J, Safford M, Judd S . Dietary Patterns and Incident Heart Failure in U.S. Adults Without Known Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(16):2036-2045. PMC: 6501554. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.067. View

5.
Taylor C, Ordonez-Mena J, Roalfe A, Lay-Flurrie S, Jones N, Marshall T . Trends in survival after a diagnosis of heart failure in the United Kingdom 2000-2017: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2019; 364:l223. PMC: 6372921. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l223. View