» Articles » PMID: 38902714

Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Large-for-gestational-age Newborns in Women Exposed to Radiation Prior to Pregnancy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jun 20
PMID 38902714
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The correlation between radiation exposure before pregnancy and abnormal birth weight has been previously proven. However, for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) babies in women exposed to radiation before becoming pregnant, there is no prediction model yet.

Material And Methods: The data were collected from the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project in China. A sum of 455 neonates (42 SGA births and 423 non-LGA births) were included. A training set (n = 319) and a test set (n = 136) were created from the dataset at random. To develop prediction models for LGA neonates, conventional logistic regression (LR) method and six machine learning methods were used in this study. Recursive feature elimination approach was performed by choosing 10 features which made a big contribution to the prediction models. And the Shapley Additive Explanation model was applied to interpret the most important characteristics that affected forecast outputs.

Results: The random forest (RF) model had the highest average area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting LGA in the test set (0.843, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.714-0.974). Except for the logistic regression model (AUC: 0.603, 95%CI: 0.440-0.767), other models' AUCs displayed well. Thereinto, the RF algorithm's final prediction model using 10 characteristics achieved an average AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.693-0.949).

Conclusion: The prediction model based on machine learning might be a promising tool for the prenatal prediction of LGA births in women with radiation exposure before pregnancy.

References
1.
Johnsson I, Haglund B, Ahlsson F, Gustafsson J . A high birth weight is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2014; 10(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.230. View

2.
Leidner V, Markfeld-Erol F, Wuttke M, Kunze M, Jacobs J, Janzarik W . Maternal blood pressure levels prepartum correlate with neonatal birth weight in preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2019; 47(8):894-896. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0267. View

3.
Shouval R, Bondi O, Mishan H, Shimoni A, Unger R, Nagler A . Application of machine learning algorithms for clinical predictive modeling: a data-mining approach in SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 49(3):332-7. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.146. View

4.
Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen M, Zilberberg E, Kalter A, Weisz B, Achiron R . Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(7):844-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01412.x. View

5.
Bukowski R, Hansen N, Willinger M, Reddy U, Parker C, Pinar H . Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(4):e1001633. PMC: 3995658. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001633. View