» Articles » PMID: 38902409

Using Wearable Technology for Posture Regulation to Improve Surgical Ergonomics in the Paediatric Operating Room: the UPRISE Trial: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Jun 20
PMID 38902409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The rising prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders has numerous physical, financial, and mental repercussions for surgeons. This study aims to establish whether the use of a wearable posture device can improve the operating time spent in suboptimal, high-risk postures.

Methods: Surgeons were recruited in Phase 1 of this prospective randomised study and baseline postural data was obtained. In Phase 2, participants were randomised to receive either a traditional educational workshop or intraoperative vibrations from the device to correct postural lapses. During minor elective day cases, intraoperative postural data was collected and stratified by forward flexion angle, into five risk categories (negligible to very high). Participants' experience with the sensor was also assessed.

Results: A total of 100 surgical procedures (Phase 1: n = 50; Phase 2: n = 50) were performed by eight surgeons of varying seniority. Exposure to the educational intervention increased time spent in suboptimal posture (Phase 1 vs. Phase 2); 47.5% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.05. However, the vibrational intervention significantly reduced this time; 50.0% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.005. Procedure type didn't influence posture although, laparoscopic interventions spent most time in negligible-risk postures; 47.7% vs. 49.3%, compared to open procedures. Surgical consultants spent less time in suboptimal posture compared to fellow/registrars; 30.3% vs. 72.6% (Phase 1) and 33.8% vs. 65.3% (Phase 2).

Conclusion: Vibrational intervention from the device significantly decreased the time spent in suboptimal, high-risk postures. As procedure type wasn't correlated with postural changes, surgeon-specific factors in regulating posture are paramount. Finally, surgeon experience was positively correlated with improved surgical ergonomics.

References
1.
Szeto G, Ho P, Ting A, Poon J, Tsang R, Cheng S . A study of surgeons' postural muscle activity during open, laparoscopic, and endovascular surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009; 24(7):1712-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0834-3. View

2.
Wang R, Liang Z, Zihni A, Ray S, Awad M . Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?. Surg Endosc. 2016; 31(8):3286-3290. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5360-5. View

3.
Hignett S, McAtamney L . Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon. 2000; 31(2):201-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3. View

4.
Sergesketter A, Lubkin D, Shammas R, Krucoff K, Peskoe S, Risoli Jr T . The Impact of Ergonomics on Recruitment to Surgical Fields: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study. J Surg Res. 2019; 236:238-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.035. View

5.
Nguyen N, Ho H, SMITH W, Philipps C, Lewis C, De Vera R . An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg. 2002; 182(6):720-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00801-7. View