» Articles » PMID: 38898569

Comparative Accuracy of Four Guidelines to Predict High-grade Dysplasia or Malignancy in Surgically Resected Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Small Nuances Between Guidelines Lead to Vastly Different Results

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

Methods: The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013-2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered "justified" if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.

Results: Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined ("high-risk stigmata" and "worrisome features") 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.

Conclusions: Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Singh S, Chandan S, Vinayek R, Dhar J, Samanta J, Capurso G World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(1):101082.

PMID: 39777250 PMC: 11684177. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.101082.

References
1.
Shin S, Han D, Park K, Kim Y, Park J, Kim S . Validating a simple scoring system to predict malignancy and invasiveness of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2010; 34(4):776-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0416-5. View

2.
Park R, Lim G, Wu J, Koh Y, Teo J, Cheow P . Validation of the clinical utility of 4 guidelines in the initial triage of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas based on cross-sectional imaging: Experience with 188 surgically-treated patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(11):2114-2121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.027. View

3.
Marchegiani G, Pollini T, Andrianello S, Tomasoni G, Biancotto M, Javed A . Progression vs Cyst Stability of Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms After Observation and Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156(7):654-661. PMC: 8135059. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1802. View

4.
Vege S, Ziring B, Jain R, Moayyedi P . American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148(4):819-22. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.015. View

5.
Konda V, Meining A, Jamil L, Giovannini M, Hwang J, Wallace M . A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy. 2013; 45(12):1006-13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344714. View