Symptomatic Diagnoses in Primary Care: an Observational Cohort Study

Overview

Journal BJGP Open

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Jun 19

PMID 38897644

Authors

Mika T Lehto

Timo Kauppila

Hannu Kautiainen

Merja K Laine

Ossi Rahkonen

Kaisu H Pitkala

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: It can be impossible to assign a definitive diagnosis for symptoms reported or observed by primary health care patients. In these situations, symptomatic diagnoses are often used.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to examine the proportion of symptomatic diagnoses among primary health care patients. We also explored which symptomatic diagnoses were most frequently recorded, as well as their distribution by age and sex.

Design & Setting: This is a register-based study carried out in the public primary health care service of the city of Vantaa, Finland.

Method: Diagnoses were entered according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). The data consisted of every diagnosis entered into the electronic health record between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018. Both absolute numbers and relative proportions of various symptomatic diagnosis recordings (chapter 'R') were reported.

Results: Of all the recorded diagnoses ( = 503 001), the proportion of R-diagnoses was 13.5% ( = 67 905). Diagnoses of symptoms and signs involving the digestive system and abdomen (R10-19) (3.7% of all; = 18 550), the circulatory and respiratory systems (R00-09) (3.5%; = 17 426), general symptoms and signs (R50-69) (3.0%; = 15 165), and the skin and subcutaneous tissue (R20-23) (2.0%; = 9812) were most prevalent. Age was also a major factor determining how symptomatic diagnoses were distributed between men and women. Overall, symptomatic diagnoses were more common among women than men (14.1% and 12.4%, respectively). The major categories of symptoms and signs involving the digestive system and abdomen, the skin and the subcutaneous tissue, and general symptoms and signs, were more predominant among women, while symptoms and signs involving the circulatory and respiratory systems were more common among men.

Conclusion: A symptomatic diagnosis code was recorded in about one eighth of GP appointments, although there were significant sex differences in the prevalence within and between diagnosis groups.

References

Ford E, Campion A, Chamles D, Habash-Bailey H, Cooper M . "You don't immediately stick a label on them": a qualitative study of influences on general practitioners' recording of anxiety disorders. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(6):e010746. PMC: 4932250. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010746. View

Lykkegaard J, Rosendal M, Brask K, Brandt L, Prior A . Prevalence of persons contacting general practice for psychological stress in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018; 36(3):272-280. PMC: 6381526. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1499494. View

Rask M, Andersen R, Bro F, Fink P, Rosendal M . Towards a clinically useful diagnosis for mild-to-moderate conditions of medically unexplained symptoms in general practice: a mixed methods study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; 15:118. PMC: 4075929. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-118. View

Hoshino E, Ohde S, Rahman M, Takahashi O, Fukui T, Deshpande G . Variation in somatic symptoms by patient health questionnaire-9 depression scores in a representative Japanese sample. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):1406. PMC: 6307287. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6327-3. View

Verbrugge L . Sex differentials in health. Public Health Rep. 1982; 97(5):417-37. PMC: 1424355. View

Rask M, Rosendal M, Fenger-Gron M, Bro F, Ornbol E, Fink P . Sick leave and work disability in primary care patients with recent-onset multiple medically unexplained symptoms and persistent somatoform disorders: a 10-year follow-up of the FIP study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014; 37(1):53-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.10.007. View

Britt H, Angelis M, Harris E . The reliability and validity of doctor-recorded morbidity data in active data collection systems. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998; 16(1):50-5. DOI: 10.1080/028134398750003412. View

Nevalainen M, Kuikka L, Pitkala K . Medical errors and uncertainty in primary healthcare: a comparative study of coping strategies among young and experienced GPs. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014; 32(2):84-9. PMC: 4075022. DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2014.929820. View

Kalenderian E, Ramoni R, White J, Schoonheim-Klein M, Stark P, Kimmes N . The development of a dental diagnostic terminology. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75(1):68-76. PMC: 3107733. View

10.

Olde Hartman T, Hassink-Franke L, Lucassen P, van Spaendonck K, van Weel C . Explanation and relations. How do general practitioners deal with patients with persistent medically unexplained symptoms: a focus group study. BMC Fam Pract. 2009; 10:68. PMC: 2758831. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-68. View

11.

Stausberg J, Lehmann N, Kaczmarek D, Stein M . Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 77(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.005. View

12.

Rasmussen S, Jensen C, Rosendal M, Vaegter H, Sondergaard J, Jarbol D . Multiple physical symptoms and individual characteristics - A cross-sectional study of the general population. J Psychosom Res. 2020; 131:109941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109941. View

13.

Verbrugge L . Sex differences in complaints and diagnoses. J Behav Med. 1980; 3(4):327-55. DOI: 10.1007/BF00845289. View

14.

Hjerpe P, Merlo J, Ohlsson H, Bengtsson Bostrom K, Lindblad U . Validity of registration of ICD codes and prescriptions in a research database in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional study in Skaraborg primary care database. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10:23. PMC: 2864192. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-23. View

15.

Rasmussen E, Ro K . How general practitioners understand and handle medically unexplained symptoms: a focus group study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018; 19(1):50. PMC: 5932817. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0745-2. View

16.

Piontek K, Shedden-Mora M, Gladigau M, Kuby A, Lowe B . Diagnosis of somatoform disorders in primary care: diagnostic agreement, predictors, and comaprisons with depression and anxiety. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1):361. PMC: 6233530. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1940-3. View

17.

Nilsson G, Ahlfeldt H, Strender L . Computerisation, coding, data retrieval and related attitudes among Swedish general practitioners-a survey of necessary conditions for a database of diseases and health problems. Int J Med Inform. 2002; 65(2):135-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00012-6. View

18.

Goldberg D, Lam T, Minhas F, Razzaque B, Robles R, Bobes J . Primary care physicians' use of the proposed classification of common mental disorders for ICD-11. Fam Pract. 2017; 34(5):574-580. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmx033. View

19.

Cook R, Render M, Woods D . Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ. 2000; 320(7237):791-4. PMC: 1117777. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791. View

20.

Walsh B, Roberts H, Nicholls P . Features and outcomes of unplanned hospital admissions of older people due to ill-defined (R-coded) conditions: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions data in England. BMC Geriatr. 2011; 11:62. PMC: 3209437. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-62. View