The Feasibility of Visualizing and Quantifying Muscle Changes in Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients Using Quantitative Muscle Ultrasound (QMUS)

Overview

Journal J Ultrasound

Publisher Springer

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Jun 19

PMID 38896395

Authors

Emily Vander Cruyssen

Jelmer van de Ven

Eric Dik

Simone Knuijt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Quantitative muscle ultrasound (QMUS) is a patient friendly tool for examining orofacial muscles. Resection of tissue can have an effect on the architecture and function of these muscles. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of visualizing and quantifying muscle changes in postoperative oral cancer patients and to relate the findings to tumor and patient characteristics.

Methods: Adult patients with a resected first primary pT1 or T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma, at least one year post operatively, where included. Ultrasound data were collected of the geniohyoid muscle, digastric muscles, masseter muscle, transverse muscle and genioglossus muscle. Ultrasound images were labeled as clearly visible, questionable or unclear. Of the clear muscles, echogenicity and muscle thickness were measured.

Results: 37 patients were included. The masseter muscle was clearly visible in all ultrasound images, both intrinsic tongue muscles had the lowest visibility (45.9%). There was a significant correlation between visibility and tumor localization for the genioglossus (p = 0.029). Age correlated with the visibility of the genioglossus muscle, BMI with the genioglossus and transverse muscles. Echogenicity and muscle thickness of the clearly identified muscles did not differ from normative values.

Conclusion: QMUS of orofacial muscles is feasible in postoperative oral cancer patients with relatively small tumor sizes. Tongue resections negatively affected the visibility of the two intrinsic tongue muscles. These preliminary results for particular muscles indicate that the use of ultrasound might be promising in oral cancer patients to help determine targeted goals in post-operative rehabilitation.

References

van Zuijlen P, Angeles A, Suijker M, Kreis R, Middelkoop E . Reliability and accuracy of techniques for surface area measurements of wounds and scars. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005; 3(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1177/1534734604263200. View

Zharkova N . Using ultrasound to quantify tongue shape and movement characteristics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 50(1):76-81. DOI: 10.1597/11-196. View

van den Engel-Hoek L, Lagarde M, van Alfen N . Ultrasound of oral and masticatory muscles: Why every neuromuscular swallow team should have an ultrasound machine. Clin Anat. 2016; 30(2):183-193. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22818. View

Chang P, Chen Y, Chang K, Wu W, Ozcakar L . Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14357. PMC: 7463001. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71378-z. View

Akgul Y, Kambhamettu C, Stone M . Automatic extraction and tracking of the tongue contours. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 18(10):1035-45. DOI: 10.1109/42.811315. View

Chang K, Wu W, Huang K, Jan W, Han D . Limb muscle quality and quantity in elderly adults with dynapenia but not sarcopenia: An ultrasound imaging study. Exp Gerontol. 2018; 108:54-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.03.019. View

Pillen S, van Keimpema M, Nievelstein R, Verrips A, van Kruijsbergen-Raijmann W, Zwarts M . Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: Visual versus quantitative evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32(9):1315-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.028. View

Shawker T, Sonies B . Tongue movement during speech: a real-time ultrasound evaluation. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984; 12(3):125-33. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870120303. View

van den Engel-Hoek L, de Groot I, Sie L, van Bruggen H, de Groot S, Erasmus C . Dystrophic changes in masticatory muscles related chewing problems and malocclusions in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2016; 26(6):354-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.03.008. View

Lo W, Chang C, Cheng P, Wen M, Wang C, Cheng P . The Applications and Potential Developments of Ultrasound in Oral Cancer Management. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221133216. PMC: 9580086. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221133216. View

10.

Scholten R, Pillen S, Verrips A, Zwarts M . Quantitative ultrasonography of skeletal muscles in children: normal values. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27(6):693-8. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10384. View

11.

Stone M . A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clin Linguist Phon. 2005; 19(6-7):455-501. DOI: 10.1080/02699200500113558. View

12.

Drakonaki E, Sudol-Szopinska I, Sinopidis C, Givissis P . High resolution ultrasound for imaging complications of muscle injury: Is there an additional role for elastography?. J Ultrason. 2019; 19(77):137-144. PMC: 6750326. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2019.0020. View

13.

Arts I, Pillen S, Jurgen Schelhaas H, Overeem S, Zwarts M . Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve. 2009; 41(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1002/mus.21458. View

13.

Wu M, Sharma P, Grajo J . The Echogenic Liver: Steatosis and Beyond. Ultrasound Q. 2020; 37(4):308-314. DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000510. View

14.

Pearson Jr W, Zumwalt A . Visualizing Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing Using Dynamic MRI. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2014; . PMC: 4108173. DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2013.846231. View

15.

Preston J, McAllister Byun T, Boyce S, Hamilton S, Tiede M, Phillips E . Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors. J Vis Exp. 2017; (119). PMC: 5351819. DOI: 10.3791/55123. View

18.

Lodder W, Teertstra H, Tan I, Pameijer F, Smeele L, van Velthuysen M . Tumour thickness in oral cancer using an intra-oral ultrasound probe. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(1):98-106. PMC: 2995869. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1891-7. View