» Articles » PMID: 38893280

Enablers and Inhibitors to Implementing Tobacco Cessation Interventions Within Homeless-Serving Agencies: A Qualitative Analysis of Program Partners' Experiences

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38893280
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the high tobacco use rates (~80%) and tobacco-related cancers being the second leading cause of death among people experiencing homelessness within the United States, these individuals rarely receive tobacco use treatment from homeless-serving agencies (HSAs). This qualitative study explored the enablers and inhibitors of implementing an evidence-based tobacco-free workplace (TFW) program offering TFW policy adoption, specialized provider training to treat tobacco use, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) within HSAs. Pre- and post-implementation interviews with providers and managers ( = 13) pursued adapting interventions to specific HSAs and assessed the program success, respectively. The organizational readiness for change theory framed the data content analysis, yielding three categories: change commitment, change efficacy and contextual factors. Pre- to post-implementation, increasing challenges impacted the organizational capacity and providers' attitudes, wherein previously enabling factors were reframed as inhibiting, resulting in limited implementation despite resource provision. These findings indicate that low-resourced HSAs require additional support and guidance to overcome infrastructure challenges and build the capacity needed to implement a TFW program. This study's findings can guide future TFW program interventions, enable identification of agencies that are well-positioned to adopt such programs, and facilitate capacity-building efforts to ensure their successful participation.

References
1.
Garner L, Ratschen E . Tobacco smoking, associated risk behaviours, and experience with quitting: a qualitative study with homeless smokers addicted to drugs and alcohol. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:951. PMC: 3853113. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-951. View

2.
Brownson R, Hopkins D, Wakefield M . Effects of smoking restrictions in the workplace. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002; 23:333-48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140551. View

3.
Garey L, Neighbors C, Martinez Leal I, Lam C, Wilson W, Kyburz B . Tobacco-related knowledge following a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace program within behavioral health facilities: Identifying organizational moderators. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102(9):1680-1686. PMC: 6661000. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.013. View

4.
Sheffer C, Al-Zalabani A, Aubrey A, Bader R, Beltrez C, Bennett S . The Emerging Global Tobacco Treatment Workforce: Characteristics of Tobacco Treatment Specialists Trained in Council-Accredited Training Programs from 2017 to 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5). PMC: 7967787. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052416. View

5.
Baggett T, OConnell J, Singer D, Rigotti N . The unmet health care needs of homeless adults: a national study. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(7):1326-33. PMC: 2882397. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180109. View