» Articles » PMID: 38893209

Disease Control and Toxicity Outcomes After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Recurrent And/or Metastatic Cancers in Young-Adult and Pediatric Patients

Abstract

Background: Pediatric patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors have poor survival outcomes despite standard-of-care systemic therapy. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) may improve tumor control. We report the outcomes with the use of SABR in our pediatric solid tumor population.

Methods: This was a single-institutional study in patients < 30 years treated with SABR. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates in R v4.2.3.

Results: In total, 48 patients receiving 135 SABR courses were included. The median age was 15.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 14-23 y) and the median follow-up was 18.1 months (IQR: 7.7-29.1). The median SABR dose was 30 Gy (IQR 25-35 Gy). The most common primary histologies were Ewing sarcoma (25%), rhabdomyosarcoma (17%), osteosarcoma (13%), and central nervous system (CNS) gliomas (13%). Furthermore, 57% of patients had oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) at the time of SABR. The one-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94%, 22%, and 70%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed, while the rates of any grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were 11.8%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung, or brain metastases and those who underwent surgery for a metastatic site had a significantly longer PFS. LC at 1-year was significantly higher for patients with a sarcoma histology (95.7% vs. 86.5%, = 0.01) and for those who received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) > 48 Gy (100% vs. 91.2%, = 0.001).

Conclusions: SABR is well tolerated in pediatric patients with 1-year local failure and OS rates of <10% and 70%, respectively. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are needed to address progression outside of the irradiated field.

Citing Articles

Risk-Stratified Radiotherapy in Pediatric Cancer.

Upadhyay R, Paulino A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39456624 PMC: 11506666. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203530.


Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Adolescent and Young Adult Malignancies.

Singh R, Bishop S, Jenkins J, Davis J, Upadhyay R, McLaughlin C Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66890.

PMID: 39280449 PMC: 11398949. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66890.

References
1.
Liu K, Chen Y, Kozono D, Mak R, Boyle P, Janeway K . Phase I/II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pulmonary Metastases in Pediatric Patients. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020; 5(6):1267-1273. PMC: 7718514. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.004. View

2.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

3.
Song C, Kim M, Cho L, Dusenbery K, Sperduto P . Radiobiological basis of SBRT and SRS. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014; 19(4):570-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-014-0717-z. View

4.
Timmerman R, Herman J, Cho L . Emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its impact on current and future clinical practice. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(26):2847-54. PMC: 4152712. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4675. View

5.
Di Perri D, Jouglar E, Blanc E, Ducassou A, Huchet A, Vigneron C . Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pediatric patients: preliminary toxicity results of a national prospective multicenter study. Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1125):20210176. PMC: 9327744. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210176. View