6.
Haffner M, Weier C, Xu M, Vaghasia A, Gurel B, Gumuskaya B
. Molecular evidence that invasive adenocarcinoma can mimic prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and intraductal carcinoma through retrograde glandular colonization. J Pathol. 2015; 238(1):31-41.
PMC: 4715537.
DOI: 10.1002/path.4628.
View
7.
Greenland N, Zhang L, Cowan J, Carroll P, Stohr B, Simko J
. Correlation of a Commercial Genomic Risk Classifier with Histological Patterns in Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019; 202(1):90-95.
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000175.
View
8.
Humphrey P, Moch H, Cubilla A, Ulbright T, Reuter V
. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(1):106-119.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028.
View
9.
Rhamy R, Buchanan R, Spalding M
. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate gland. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1972; 64:61-8.
View
10.
Shah R, Nguyen J, Przybycin C, Reynolds J, Cox R, Myles J
. Atypical intraductal proliferation detected in prostate needle biopsy is a marker of unsampled intraductal carcinoma and other adverse pathological features: a prospective clinicopathological study of 62 cases with emphasis on pathological outcomes. Histopathology. 2019; 75(3):346-353.
DOI: 10.1111/his.13878.
View
11.
Rijstenberg L, Hansum T, Hollemans E, Kweldam C, Kummerlin I, Bangma C
. Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Histopathology. 2020; 77(5):742-748.
PMC: 7692905.
DOI: 10.1111/his.14179.
View
12.
Kweldam C, Wildhagen M, Steyerberg E, Bangma C, van der Kwast T, van Leenders G
. Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2014; 28(3):457-64.
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.116.
View
13.
McNeal J, Yemoto C
. Spread of adenocarcinoma within prostatic ducts and acini. Morphologic and clinical correlations. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996; 20(7):802-14.
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199607000-00003.
View
14.
Trinh V, Sirois J, Benzerdjeb N, Mansoori B, Grosset A, Albadine R
. The impact of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on the site and timing of recurrence and cancer-specific survival. Prostate. 2018; 78(10):697-706.
DOI: 10.1002/pros.23513.
View
15.
Porter L, Lawrence M, Ilic D, Clouston D, Bolton D, Frydenberg M
. Systematic Review Links the Prevalence of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate to Prostate Cancer Risk Categories. Eur Urol. 2017; 72(4):492-495.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.013.
View
16.
Elfandy H, Armenia J, Pederzoli F, Pullman E, Pertega-Gomes N, Schultz N
. Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants of Aggressiveness in Cribriform Carcinoma of the Prostate. Mol Cancer Res. 2018; 17(2):446-456.
PMC: 6359952.
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0440.
View
17.
van Leenders G, van der Kwast T, Grignon D, Evans A, Kristiansen G, Kweldam C
. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44(8):e87-e99.
PMC: 7382533.
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001497.
View
18.
Dong F, Wang C, Farris A, Wu S, Lee H, Olumi A
. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012; 36(6):838-43.
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182486faf.
View
19.
Sauter G, Steurer S, Clauditz T, Krech T, Wittmer C, Lutz F
. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(4):592-598.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029.
View
20.
Miyai K, Divatia M, Shen S, Miles B, Ayala A, Ro J
. Clinicopathological analysis of intraductal proliferative lesions of prostate: intraductal carcinoma of prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and atypical cribriform lesion. Hum Pathol. 2014; 45(8):1572-81.
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.03.011.
View