» Articles » PMID: 38893054

Rethinking Strategies for Multi-Metastatic Patients: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis on Open Posterior Fusion Versus Percutaneous Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Vertebral Metastases

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38893054
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Managing vertebral metastases (VM) is still challenging in oncology, necessitating the use of effective surgical strategies to preserve patient quality of life (QoL). Traditional open posterior fusion (OPF) and percutaneous osteosynthesis (PO) are well-documented approaches, but their comparative efficacy remains debated. This retrospective study compared short-term outcomes (6-12 months) between OPF and PO in 78 cancer patients with spinal metastases. This comprehensive evaluation included functional, clinical, and radiographic parameters. Statistical analysis utilized PRISM software (version 10), with significance set at < 0.05. PO demonstrated advantages over OPF, including shorter surgical durations, reduced blood loss, and hospital stay, along with lower perioperative complication rates. Patient quality of life and functional outcomes favored PO, particularly at the 6-month mark. The mortality rates at one year were significantly lower in the PO group. Minimally invasive techniques offer promising benefits in VM management, optimizing patient outcomes and QoL. Despite limitations, this study advocates for the adoption of minimally invasive approaches to enhance the care of multi-metastatic patients with symptomatic VM.

References
1.
Delank K, Wendtner C, Eich H, Eysel P . The treatment of spinal metastases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011; 108(5):71-9. PMC: 3036978. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0071. View

2.
Gasbarrini A, Li H, Cappuccio M, Mirabile L, Paderni S, Terzi S . Efficacy evaluation of a new treatment algorithm for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(15):1466-70. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c680b9. View

3.
Fisher C, DiPaola C, Ryken T, Bilsky M, Shaffrey C, Berven S . A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(22):E1221-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2. View

4.
Ricciardi L, Sturiale C, Pucci R, Reale G, Stifano V, Izzo A . Patient-Oriented Aesthetic Outcome After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Observational Study Comparing Minimally Invasive and Standard Open Procedures. World Neurosurg. 2018; 122:e1041-e1046. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.208. View

5.
Miscusi M, Polli F, Forcato S, Ricciardi L, Frati A, Cimatti M . Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(5):518-25. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131201. View