» Articles » PMID: 38892610

Science and Faith to Understand Milk Bioactivity for Infants

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38892610
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Milk bioactivity refers to the specific health effects of milk components beyond nutrition. The science of milk bioactivity involves the systematic study of these components and their health effects, as verified by empirical data, controlled experiments, and logical arguments. Conversely, 'faith in milk bioactivity' can be defined as personal opinion, meaning, value, trust, and hope for health effects that are beyond investigation by natural, social, or human sciences. Faith can be strictly secular, but also influenced by spirituality or religion. The aim of this paper is to show that scientific knowledge is frequently supplemented with faith convictions to establish personal and public understanding of milk bioactivity. Mammalian milk is an immensely complex fluid containing myriad proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and micronutrients with multiple functions across species, genetics, ages, environments, and cultures. Human health includes not only physical health, but also social, mental, and spiritual health, requiring widely different fields of science to prove the relevance, safety, and efficacy of milk interventions. These complex relationships between milk feeding and health outcomes prevent firm conclusions based on science and logic alone. Current beliefs in and understanding of the value of breast milk, colostrum, infant formula, or isolated milk proteins (e.g., immunoglobulins, α-lactalbumin, lactoferrin, and growth factors) show that both science and faith contribute to understand, stimulate, or restrict the use of milk bioactivity. The benefits of breastfeeding for infants are beyond doubt, but the strong beliefs in its health effects rely not only on science, and mechanisms are unclear. Likewise, fear of, or trust in, infant formula may rely on both science and faith. Knowledge from science safeguards individuals and society against 'milk bioactivity superstition'. Conversely, wisdom from faith-based convictions may protect science from unrealistic 'milk bioactivity scientism'. Honesty and transparency about the potentials and limitations of both scientific knowledge and faith convictions are important when informing individuals and society about the nutritious and bioactive qualities of milk.

Citing Articles

Holistic approaches to explain and combat obesity.

Stripp T, Sangild P Nat Metab. 2025; 7(1):1-2.

PMID: 39753711 DOI: 10.1038/s42255-024-01197-3.

References
1.
Chen B, Jia Q, Chen Z, You Y, Liu Y, Zhao J . Comparative evaluation of enriched formula milk powder with OPO and MFGM breastfeeding and regular formula milk powder in full-term infants: a comprehensive study on gut microbiota, neurodevelopment, and growth. Food Funct. 2024; 15(3):1417-1430. DOI: 10.1039/d3fo03392a. View

2.
Jiang P, Muk T, Krych L, Nielsen D, Khakimov B, Li Y . Gut colonization in preterm infants supplemented with bovine colostrum in the first week of life: An explorative pilot study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021; 46(3):592-599. DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2191. View

3.
Gulcan Kersin S, Ozek E . Breast milk stem cells: Are they magic bullets in neonatology?. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021; 56(3):187-191. PMC: 8152646. DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21006. View

4.
Subbarayappa B . Siddha medicine: an overview. Lancet. 1998; 350(9094):1841-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04223-2. View

5.
Koenig H . Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Can J Psychiatry. 2009; 54(5):283-91. DOI: 10.1177/070674370905400502. View