» Articles » PMID: 38892256

Dual Exposure to E-Cigarette Vapour and Cigarette Smoke Results in Poorer Airway Cell, Monocyte, and Macrophage Function Than Single Exposure

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38892256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

E-cigarette users predominantly also continue to smoke cigarettes. These Dual Users either consume e-cigarettes in locations where smoking is not allowed, but vaping is, or to reduce their consumption of cigarettes, believing it will lead to harm reduction. Whilst it is known that e-cigarette vapour is chemically less complex than cigarette smoke, it has a distinct chemical profile, and very little is known about the health impacts of exposure to both chemical profiles vs. either alone. We simultaneously exposed cells in vitro to non-toxic levels of e-cigarette vapour extract (EVE) and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) to determine their effects on 16HBE14o- airway epithelial cell metabolism and inflammatory response, as well as immune cell (THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) from healthy volunteers) migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory response. We observed increased toxicity, reduced metabolism (a marker of proliferation) in airway epithelial cells, and reduced monocyte migration, macrophage phagocytosis, and altered chemokine production after exposure to either CSE or EVE. These cellular responses were greater after dual exposure to CSE and EVE. The airway epithelial cells from smokers showed reduced metabolism after EVE (the Switcher model) and dual CSE and EVE exposure. When EVE and CSE were allowed to interact, the chemicals were found to be altered, and new chemicals were also found compared to the CSE and EVE profiles. Dual exposure to e-cigarette vapour and cigarette smoke led to worse functional outcomes in cells compared to either single exposure alone, adding to limited data that dual use may be more dangerous than smoking only.

Citing Articles

Immunological Effects of Electronic Cigarette Use: A Review of Current Evidence.

Zima K, Bogucka A, Wojtas M, Zabielska-Kaczorowska M Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025; 68(1):9.

PMID: 39891861 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-025-09026-5.


E-cigarettes increase the risk of adenoma formation in murine colorectal cancer model.

Sayed I, Chakraborty A, Inouye K, Dugan L, Tocci S, Advani I bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39253444 PMC: 11383026. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.23.609469.

References
1.
Larcombe A, Allard S, Pringle P, Mead-Hunter R, Anderson N, Mullins B . Chemical analysis of fresh and aged Australian e-cigarette liquids. Med J Aust. 2021; 216(1):27-32. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51280. View

2.
Hickman E, Herrera C, Jaspers I . Common E-Cigarette Flavoring Chemicals Impair Neutrophil Phagocytosis and Oxidative Burst. Chem Res Toxicol. 2019; 32(6):982-985. PMC: 6626492. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00171. View

3.
Alford K, Kumar N . Pulmonary Health Effects of Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds-A Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4). PMC: 7914726. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041578. View

4.
Alanazi H, Park H, Chakir J, Semlali A, Rouabhia M . Comparative study of the effects of cigarette smoke and electronic cigarettes on human gingival fibroblast proliferation, migration and apoptosis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018; 118:390-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.049. View

5.
Serpa G, Renton N, Lee N, Crane M, Jamieson A . Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Aerosol-induced Cell Death and Dysfunction in Macrophages and Lung Epithelial Cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2020; 63(3):306-316. PMC: 7462344. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0200OC. View