» Articles » PMID: 38891695

A Comparative Full-Length Transcriptome Analysis Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) in Four Tissues of Bovine Origin

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38891695
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The transcriptome complexity and splicing patterns in male and female cattle are ambiguous, presenting a substantial obstacle to genomic selection programs that seek to improve productivity, disease resistance, and reproduction in cattle. A comparative transcriptomic analysis using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) was conducted in bovine testes (TESTs), ovaries (OVAs), muscles (MUSCs), and livers (LIVs). An average of 5,144,769 full-length reads were obtained from each sample. The TESTs were found to have the greatest number of alternative polyadenylation (APA) events involved in processes such as sperm flagellum development and fertilization in male reproduction. In total, 438 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) were identified in the LIVs in a comparison of females vs. males, and 214 DETs were identified in the MUSCs between females and males. Additionally, 14,735, 36,347, and 33,885 DETs were detected in MUSC vs. LIV, MUSC vs. TEST, and OVA vs. TEST comparisons, respectively, revealing the complexity of the TEST. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showed that these DETs were mainly involved in the "spermatogenesis", "flagellated sperm motility", "spermatid development", "reproduction", "reproductive process", and "microtubule-based movement" KEGG pathways. Additional studies are necessary to further characterize the transcriptome in different cell types, developmental stages, and physiological conditions in bovines and ascertain the functions of the novel transcripts.

Citing Articles

Exploring Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing in Duck Embryonic Myoblasts via Full-Length Transcriptome Sequencing.

Wu J, Liu S, Jiang D, Zhou Y, Jiang H, Xiao X Vet Sci. 2024; 11(12).

PMID: 39728941 PMC: 11680404. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11120601.

References
1.
Koonin E, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Krylov D, Makarova K . A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2004; 5(2):R7. PMC: 395751. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r7. View

2.
Yu M, Zhang X, Yan J, Guo J, Zhang F, Zhu K . Transcriptional Specificity Analysis of Testis and Epididymis Tissues in Donkey. Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(12). PMC: 9777602. DOI: 10.3390/genes13122339. View

3.
Love M, Huber W, Anders S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):550. PMC: 4302049. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. View

4.
Garcia-Ruiz A, Cole J, VanRaden P, Wiggans G, Ruiz-Lopez F, Van Tassell C . Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(28):E3995-4004. PMC: 4948329. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519061113. View

5.
Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar G, Sonnhammer E . Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 49(D1):D412-D419. PMC: 7779014. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913. View