» Articles » PMID: 38891186

Can 'What Is Known' About Social Isolation and Loneliness Interventions Sufficiently Inform the Clinical Practice of Health Care and Social Service Professionals Who Work with Older Adults? Exploring Knowledge-to-Practice Gaps

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38891186
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Establishing intervention effectiveness is an important component of a broader knowledge translation (KT) process. However, mobilizing the implementation of these interventions into practice is perhaps the most important aspect of the KT cycle. The purpose of the current study was to conduct an umbrella review to (a) identify promising interventions for SI&L in older adults, (b) interpret (translate) the findings to inform clinical knowledge and practice interventions in different settings and contexts, and (c) highlight research gaps that may hinder the uptake of these interventions in practice. The broader purpose of this study was to inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on SI&L for HCSSPs. In line with other reviews, our study noted variations in methods and intervention designs that prohibit definitive statements about intervention effectiveness. Perhaps, the most significant contribution of the current review was in identifying knowledge-to-practice gaps that inhibit the implementation of interventions into practice-based realities.

Citing Articles

Embracing Connection: A Review of First-Ever Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults.

Hoang P, Conn D Geriatrics (Basel). 2024; 9(5).

PMID: 39311242 PMC: 11417758. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9050117.

References
1.
Procidano M, Heller K . Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol. 1983; 11(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF00898416. View

2.
Chen Y, Schulz P . The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(1):e18. PMC: 4751336. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4596. View

3.
Henderson S, Byrne D, Scott R . Measuring social relationships. The Interview Schedule for Social Interaction. Psychol Med. 1980; 10(4):723-34. DOI: 10.1017/s003329170005501x. View

4.
Leavell M, Leiferman J, Gascon M, Braddick F, Gonzalez J, Litt J . Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019; 6(4):297-308. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7. View

5.
Koenig H, Westlund R, George L, Hughes D, Blazer D, Hybels C . Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics. 1993; 34(1):61-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71928-3. View