» Articles » PMID: 38890322

Biotic Interactions Promote Local Adaptation to Soil in Plants

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jun 18
PMID 38890322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although different ecological factors shape adaptative evolution in natural habitats, we know little about how their interactions impact local adaptation. Here we used eight generations of experimental evolution with outcrossing Brassica rapa plants as a model system, in eight treatment groups that varied in soil type, herbivory (with/without aphids), and pollination mode (hand- or bumblebee-pollination), to study how biotic interactions affect local adaptation to soil. First, we show that several plant traits evolved in response to biotic interactions in a soil-specific way. Second, using a reciprocal transplant experiment, we demonstrate that significant local adaptation to soil-type evolved in the "number of open flowers", a trait used as a fitness proxy, but only in plants that evolved with herbivory and bee pollination. Whole genome re-sequencing of experimental lines revealed that biotic interactions caused a 10-fold increase in the number of SNPs across the genome with significant allele frequency change, and that alleles with opposite allele frequency change in different soil types (antagonistic pleiotropy) were most common in plants with an evolutionary history of herbivory and bee pollination. Our results demonstrate that the interaction with mutualists and antagonists can facilitate local adaptation to soil type through antagonistic pleiotropy.

References
1.
Todesco M, Owens G, Bercovich N, Legare J, Soudi S, Burge D . Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers. Nature. 2020; 584(7822):602-607. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2467-6. View

2.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A . The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20(9):1297-303. PMC: 2928508. DOI: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. View

3.
Hereford J . A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat. 2009; 173(5):579-88. DOI: 10.1086/597611. View

4.
Briscoe Runquist R, Gorton A, Yoder J, Deacon N, Grossman J, Kothari S . Context Dependence of Local Adaptation to Abiotic and Biotic Environments: A Quantitative and Qualitative Synthesis. Am Nat. 2020; 195(3):412-431. DOI: 10.1086/707322. View

5.
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers C, Banks E, DePristo M . The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(15):2156-8. PMC: 3137218. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330. View